- UID
- 1192980
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2016-2-23
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
-- the subject of the preceding clause should also make sense as the agent of the -ING action.
examples:
Joe broke the window, angering his father. -->this sentence makes sense, because it correctly implies that joe"a ngered his father".
the window was broken by Joe, angering his father.--> this sentence doesn't make sense, because it implies that the window(i.e., not joe himself) angered joe's father.
my brother tricked me, disappointing Dad --> implies that dad is disappointed in my brother for tricking me (and not necessarily disappointed in me for being tricked).
i was tricked by my brother, disappointing Dad --> implies that dad is disappointed in me because i fell for my brother's trick (and not that he's disappointed in my brother for tricking me).
实战中需要考虑这一点吗，后面的ving的逻辑主语需要和前面主句的主语一致？
我怎么觉得是主句的整个句子来做后面ving的逻辑主语啊？
有没有大神可以解释一下 或者举些反驳RON这一点的GMAT中的正确句子啊？？ |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2016-3-22 11:52:00
收藏
收藏
楼主
