ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3496|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教:OG16 SC 122 Originally developed for detecting air pollutes

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-9-14 11:36:48 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray

  emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without

  destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

  (A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

  (B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission

  (C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

  (D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

  (E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,


答案选A。 B选项比较清楚了,想请教前辈们,C/D/E的called proton-XXXXX这个结构为什么OG说要紧跟technique?感谢~
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2015-9-14 16:14:03 | 只看该作者
called proton-XXXXX 是过去分词作定语,曼哈顿和prep里都有 touch rule,就是作为定语的修饰语不能距离 它修饰的名次距离过远,否则会引起歧义等问题。因为这些定语,例如comma+which,都是默认修饰离自己最近的那个名词(前方的)。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2015-9-14 17:37:38 | 只看该作者
zszszssz 发表于 2015-9-14 16:14
called proton-XXXXX 是过去分词作定语,曼哈顿和prep里都有 touch rule,就是作为定语的修饰语不能距离 它 ...

好的知道了!感谢!
地板
发表于 2015-9-22 17:51:43 | 只看该作者
借LZ的帖子问一下,我的点在A和C选项中出现的comma+which的用法。尽管A选项中各个modifier的排列已经尽合逻辑了,但就像2楼提到的touch rule,A选项中“...emission,which..."为什么就不会像C选项中的which一样,也有修饰emission的嫌疑呢?many thanks!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2015-9-23 17:30:53 | 只看该作者
wxt_357 发表于 2015-9-22 17:51
借LZ的帖子问一下,我的点在A和C选项中出现的comma+which的用法。尽管A选项中各个modifier的排列已经尽合逻 ...

因为这两个东西是一个东西吧....
6#
发表于 2016-2-27 23:57:43 | 只看该作者
wxt_357 发表于 2015-9-22 17:51
借LZ的帖子问一下,我的点在A和C选项中出现的comma+which的用法。尽管A选项中各个modifier的排列已经尽合逻 ...

同问,没有看明白og的说明
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-16 08:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部