ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1149|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]80,22提纲讨论

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-18 00:58:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]80,22提纲讨论

80. The following appeared in the editorial section of a monthly business newsmagazine.


“Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.”


22. The following appeared in the editorial section of a newspaper.


“As public concern over drug abuse has increased, authorities have become more vigilant in their efforts to prevent illegal drugs from entering the country. Many drug traffickers have consequently switched from marijuana, which is bulky, or heroin, which has a market too small to justify the risk of severe punishment, to cocaine. Thus enforcement efforts have ironically resulted in an observed increase in the illegal use of cocaine.”


请教上2题的逻辑错误点,谢谢


沙发
发表于 2005-7-18 08:40:00 | 只看该作者
呵呵没生气吧?这也是为了方便你和大家哦
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-18 10:41:00 | 只看该作者

my fault.


平时受judy斑斑提纲论据的恩惠太多,这次又犯错了.这是汗啊.....


等我考完了,一定多来awa区帮忙.


还有,80确实没有讨论过,我的一个提纲是risky导致工资增加,但是safer不一定减少


还有一点我本来想,risk 真的导致工资增加吗?groundless assumption?但看题目好象那个是作者的前提给定条件,在做逻辑的时候我们也不能反驳给定条件的,所以迷惑中....

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-24 14:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部