ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1240|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一个关于代词重复的问题!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-13 22:18:00 | 只看该作者

请教一个关于代词重复的问题!

187. In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many Americans were killed as would later be killed on the beaches of Normandy during D-Day.


(A)  Americans were killed as


(B)  Americans were killed than


(C)  Americans were killed than those who


(D)  more Americans were killed as there


(E)   more Americans were killed as those who


Choice A, the best answer, is the only option that accurately expresses the comparison by using the idiomatic form as many... as. In B and C, as many ... than is unidiomatic, and in C and E, those who is a wordy intrusion. In D and E, more is redundant because the phrase four times as many in the original sentence conveys the idea of more.


为什么those who是wordy的呢? OG里面those who一搜一大把, ETS这里什么意思?



194. Presenters at the seminar, one who is blind, will


demonstrate adaptive equipment that allows visually impaired people to use computers.


(A)  one who


(B)  one of them who


(C)  and one of them who


(D)  one of whom


(E)   one of which


The subject, presenters, must be followed by a limiting appositive _ such as one of whom, that identifies an indi­vidual from among a larger group. Choice D is best: one of whom best serves an appositive to the subject, presenters, because the phrase means "one from among several or many." Choice A, one who, is unacceptable because one who cannot refer to the plural presenters. Choices B and C are ungrammatical because who competes with one as the subject of is. Choice E employs which, a relative pronoun that does not refer to people (presenters), but only to things.


不知道这题和上面的题目有没有关系, 感觉也是两个代词共用一个动词, 这样是不可以的吗? 谢谢各位NN, 帮忙看看吧.


沙发
发表于 2005-7-13 22:54:00 | 只看该作者

为什么those who是wordy的呢? OG里面those who一搜一大把, ETS这里什么意思?


In this particular case, those who is wordy. It certainly does not make all other occurrences of this phrase invalid. Those who committed the crime will be punished is perfectly fine.


不知道这题和上面的题目有没有关系, 感觉也是两个代词共用一个动词, 这样是不可以的吗? 谢谢各位NN, 帮忙看看吧.


one of them who is ambiguous. Are all of the presenters blind? Or just one of them?

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-14 08:02:00 | 只看该作者

OG187里面的those who为什么就不行呢?


one of them who is, 我觉得单数的be动词已经决定了不可能修饰的them上面, 所以不会产生所有presenter都blind的歧义吧?

地板
发表于 2005-7-14 16:26:00 | 只看该作者

one of them who is, 我觉得单数的be动词已经决定了不可能修饰的them上面, 所以不会产生所有presenter都blind的歧义吧?


How about two of them who are? Would that look ambiguous enough to you?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-14 16:27:14编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-14 17:01:00 | 只看该作者

但是OG里面题目用的是is啊?!


如果是are应该是有歧义的, 但是为什么is也不可以?

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-15 07:40:00 | 只看该作者
我顶!
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-15 16:13:00 | 只看该作者
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-16 16:42:00 | 只看该作者
还是不懂
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-16 20:46:00 | 只看该作者
NN看一下吧, 以前没有讨论过的问题.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 17:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部