ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1255|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教OG-21

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-9 11:14:00 | 只看该作者

求教OG-21

21. Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpe­trators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.


(A)  in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy


(B)   if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food


(C)  in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food


(D)  if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior


(E)   in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior


In choices A, C, and E, in attributing ... behavior modifies the perpetrators, producing the illogical statement that the perpetrators rather than the defense attorneys are attributing behavior to food allergies. Choice C is also wordy, and attributing ... as is unidiomatic in E. In the correct form of the expression, one attributes x, an effect, to y, a cause; or, if a passive construction is used, x is attributed to y. D avoids the initial modification error by using a passive construction (in which the attributors are not identified), but attributed x as the cause of y is unidiomatic. Choice B is best.


关键是这一题我看的一团雾水,哪位NN能帮我分析一下。

沙发
发表于 2005-7-9 18:40:00 | 只看该作者

有没有看过大家的讨论呢


提问总结

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-26 11:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部