1、Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place; one reson is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals. (A)Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place; one reson is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals. (E) The finding of much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in those that are free of such chemicals suggests one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place. 答案是A,我没有疑问？？ （1）可是为什么OG(200题)说E是一个不正确的比较呢？我觉着E选项从比较这一点上说应该没什么问题啊？those 指带soils啊？比较中不是要用that或those来指带前面重复的名词吗？？那么它又与A中的直接用in soils...than in soils有什么区别呢？ （2）想问一下修饰的问题 还是这个E选项，稍微改动一下 the finding...suggests one reason that certain pesticides can become ineffective if used... 像这种重句套着重句，if从句修饰谁该如何判断呢？是修饰宾语重句呢还是修饰主句呢？因为这个涉及到 if used的逻辑主语的问题？？ 2、Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than (they had in their previous campaigns), it had provisions for only twenty-four days. E. for any previous campaign. 问一下这个是不是个省略，(it had had ) for any previous campaign??是不？？但是总觉着有些别扭啊？？(OG 198) 3、In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many (Americans were killed as) would later be killed on the beaches of Mormandy during D-Day. A. Americans were killed as C. Americans were killed than those who E. more Americans were killed as those who 答案同意是A,可是为什么OG上说in C and E, those who is a wordy intrusion??如果按照他的说法，那么C和E稍稍改动一下 Americans were killed as those who 是不是也不对呢？？
1. 1)比较的是populations, 所以than后面应该补出those(指populations) of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils free of such chemicals，简略点 those in soils free of such chemicals，甚至in soils free of such chemicals，也比E选项中莫名奇妙的结构要强。 2)个人认为，如果无法清晰的判断修饰，（从而判断逻辑和语法上一致，）就很可能是错误的选项。（避实就虚...//blush）
2 than (those the army had) for any previous campaign btw 这里用过去一般时没什么问题吧？
3. C. than不对; E. more不对。 correctness的没搞定，effectiveness的再弄也...
1. one reson is suggested by the finding that 。。。: 按说不是一个好的用法，因为是被动式。 但是E的： suggests one reason certain pesticides 。。。是一种luol嗦的说法，用suggest 就足够了，另外 in those指代不清，因为 前面还有一个populations。 if从句修饰谁该如何判断呢？ 应该是就近判断，离的太远对任何修饰词来说都是错误的。
2. 省略的问题，其实最需要记住：应该是省略的一样的成份。而不要去想自认为合理的成份 。。。 than ( the army had entered other sites with！supplies ) for
3. four times as many (Americans were killed as) would later be killed on the beaches of Mormandy during D-Day.
省略的就是要和以前的成份一样：four times as many (Americans were killed as) [Americans] would later be killed
以下是引用RMSF在2003-8-18 11:03:00的发言： 1. one reson is suggested by the finding that 。。。: 按说不是一个好的用法，因为是被动式。 但是E的： suggests one reason certain pesticides 。。。是一种luol嗦的说法，用suggest 就足够了，
这个... suggests one reason 罗嗦，那one reason is suggested 就不罗嗦了啊？这两个如果要用罗嗦来排除的话应该要错一起错才对吗？？
以下是引用RMSF在2003-8-18 11:03:00的发言： 3. four times as many (Americans were killed as) would later be killed on the beaches of Mormandy during D-Day.
省略的就是要和以前的成份一样：four times as many (Americans were killed as) [Americans] would later be killed
可是... OG上说in C and E, those who is a wordy intrusion??那一前不都是用those来指代前面出现的复数名词的吗，这句话要是改成four times as many Americans were killed as those who would later be killed on the beaches of Mormandy during D-Day.到底应不应该对呢？？
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2003-8-17 21:16:00
楼主
