- UID
- 1057382
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2014-10-15
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
6#
楼主 |
发表于 2015-9-4 21:39:43
|
只看该作者
谢谢谢谢~~
我把Manhattan上的几个回帖贴出来了~
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value
by Samy Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:06 pm
Q24: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals
and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock
fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.
A. wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind
of fat they think is
B. wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of
fat thought to be
C. wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more
fat of a kind thought to be
D. total fat of wild animals is less than livestock fed on grain and they have more fat
of a kind thought to be
E. total fat is less in wild animals than that of livestock fed on grain and more of
their fat is of a kind they think is
Between B and C, what is your pick ?
Is the comparison in C correct ?
Thanks.
by StaceyKoprince Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:17 pm
B. It correctly compares wild animals to livestock fed on grain and constructs the "less X and more Y" idiom correctly.
C compares wild animals to "that of" livestock... what is "that of" referring to? It also says "have less X and have more Y" - we don't need the second have. The first have can apply to both parts of the idiom.
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director of Online Community
ManhattanGMAT
Samy
这是第一个回答,指出C选项里的that of 的错误,that没有指代对象
by RonPurewal Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:19 am
when you see a comparison, you need to boil the comparison down to the SINGLE NOUNS/PRONOUNS that are compared. this means, inter alia, that you have to dispense with modifiers, prepositional phrases, and the like - the same irrelevant constructions that go out the window when you consider other types of agreement (like subject-verb agreement).
in the example you've cited, the comparison is between PROTEIN ('in rice' is a modifying prepositional phrase, so it gets chucked) and THAT (which of course refers to protein), and is therefore proper.
in q24 choice c, the comparison is between ANIMALS and THAT (which in this case stands for FAT). you can't consider livestock to be the second half of the comparison, because it's part of a prepositional phrase (which is a modifier and therefore can't be part of the comparison).
这是Ron的解释 |
|