ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 862|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-99-06-1-24

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-29 06:31:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-99-06-1-24

We ought to pay attention only to the intrinsic properties of a work of art. Its other, extrinsic properties are irrelevant to our aesthetic interactions with it. For example, when we look at a painting we should consider only what is directly presented in our experience of it what is really aesthetically relevant, therefore, is not what a painting symbolizes, but what it directly presents to experience.


The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is added to the premises?


A. What an artwork symbolizes involves only extrinsic properties of that work.


B. There are certain properties of our experience of artworks that cna be distinguished as symbolic properties.


C. Only an artwork's intrinsic properties are relevant to our aesthetic interactions with it.


D. It is possible in theory for an artwork to symbolize nothing


E. An intrinsic property of an artwork is one that relates the work to itself

沙发
发表于 2005-5-29 08:01:00 | 只看该作者
the conclusion of the stimulus should be the first sentence, not the last sentence which is the subconclusion and the premise of main conclcusion. The gap of the reasoning is "is not what a painting symmbolizes" and "intrinsic properties of a work of art". So A is the right answer.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-12 05:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部