补充5-8，关于need

pyndick · 发表于 2003-8-6 17:11:00

8. As litigation grows more complex, the need that experts explain technical issues becomes more
apparent.
(A) that experts explain technical issues becomes
(B) for experts to explain technical issues became
(C) for experts to explain technical issues becomes
(D) that technical issues be explained by experts became
(E) that there be explanations of technical issues by experts has become

有need不能接that clause的权威说法？

summer2003 · 发表于 2003-8-6 18:26:00

以下是引用pyndick在2003-8-6 17:11:00的发言：
8. As litigation grows more complex, the need that experts explain technical issues becomes more
apparent.
(A) that experts explain technical issues becomes
(B) for experts to explain technical issues became
(C) for experts to explain technical issues becomes
(D) that technical issues be explained by experts became
(E) that there be explanations of technical issues by experts has become

有need不能接that clause的权威说法？

我的意见是：

A.作为定语从句，改变了句意，而且不知代替什么成分
C 时态
D 没有表示虚拟的意思，时态
E。罗索，时态，且改变句意

terrygoodboy200 · 发表于 2003-8-7 00:33:00

B D 首先时态错了。
need用法做名词。应该是in need of sth ,the need for sth。
the need that这种结构不和语法，语意解释不通。

C

summer2003 · 发表于 2003-8-7 00:51:00

以下是引用terrygoodboy2004在2003-8-7 0:33:00的发言：
B D 首先时态错了。
need用法做名词。应该是in need of sth ,the need for sth。
the need that这种结构不和语法，语意解释不通。

C

同意,是过去式错.
选C

gsluo · 发表于 2003-8-11 15:18:00

我觉得此题应该从ETS最基本简洁原则考虑，A从语法上讲没错，但C更简洁所以选C。

1stzhang · 发表于 2003-8-11 21:39:00

定语从句中的that是必须在从句中作为成分存在，但是看看A，that指代 the need 在从句中不作任何语法成分，所以从语法上也是错误的。

midnight · 发表于 2003-8-14 10:36:00

Ａ其实是同位语从句，解释ＮＥＥＤ的内容．同意五楼的分析．

greattaste · 发表于 2003-8-14 13:48:00

以下是引用midnight在2003-8-14 10:36:00的发言：
Ａ其实是同位语从句，解释ＮＥＥＤ的内容．同意五楼的分析．

同意。 A是同位语从句.

补充5-8，关于need

补充5-8，关于need

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()