ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2198|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Lsat 5-II-14 求教-->babypace转移

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-6-25 17:38:00 | 只看该作者

Lsat 5-II-14 求教

Pamela: Physicians training for a medical specialty serve as resident staff physicians in hospitals. They work such long hours-up to 36 consecutive hours- that fatigue impairs their ability to make the best medical decisions during the final portion of their shifts.

Quincy: Thousands of physicians now practicing have been trained according to the same regimen, and records show they generally made good medical decisions during their training periods. Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?

Which one of the following , if true, is the most effective counter Pamela might make to Quincy's argument?

B. Because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stay than in the past.

为什么选B,medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals 有什么作用?
沙发
发表于 2003-6-26 12:46:00 | 只看该作者
这题可以理解为削弱题,即削弱P的结论。p的结论是没有必要改变工作时间,它的前提是以前的记录表明医生可以工作的很好。削弱的一种方法是找到前提的缺陷。选项B表明现在的重病号多了,所以要求医生更多的精力,反过来就是说情况变了,过去的纪录不适用了。所以前提有缺陷。所以选b
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-26 13:21:00 | 只看该作者
thank you
地板
发表于 2005-4-11 13:26:00 | 只看该作者

Lsat 5-II-14 求教-->babypace转移

是削弱q的结论!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 22:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部