曼哈顿语法agree的例句疑问！

flavia878 · 发表于 2015-5-18 15:02:22

AGREE

RIGHT:

Electrons are particles THAT physicists AGREE EXIST.

WRONG:

Electrons are particles physicistsAGREE THAT EXIST.

正确用法里，that引导的从句修饰particles这个antecedent，physicists Agree是做插入成分吗？
错误的对比句里，错在哪儿，我就觉得没正确句子读的顺，有没有大神分析一下句子成分，谢谢！

全部的agree用法曼哈顿给了下面这些

AGREE

RIGHT:They AGREE THATelectrons EXIST.

Electrons are particles THAT physicists AGREE EXIST.

SUSPECT:There is AGREEMENT AMONG them THAT electrons exist.

They AGREE electrons EXIST.(AGREE THAT is preferred)

Electrons are particlesTHAT physicists AGREE ON AS EXISTING.

WRONG: There is AGREEMENT AMONG them TO THE FACTTHAT electrons exist.

Electrons are particles physicistsAGREE THAT EXIST.

Electrons are particlesphysicists AGREE TO EXIST.

ukyo2003 · 发表于 2015-5-18 20:53:27

AGREE

RIGHT:

Electrons are particles THAT physicists AGREE EXIST.

WRONG:

Electrons are particles physicistsAGREE THAT EXIST

Electrons are particles that [physicists agree] exist. that=限定定语modifier修饰particles，that同时做that clause的逻辑主语，exist是that clause的逻辑谓语，physicists agree=插入语

Electrons are particles physicists agree that exist. that=宾语从句引导词，做agree的宾语，that后面要求完整表达agree的内容。run on句子，that后面表达不完整，所以错误。

flavia878 · 发表于 2015-5-18 22:32:46

ukyo2003 发表于 2015-5-18 20:53
Electrons are particles that exist. that=限定定语modifier修饰particles，that同时做that clause的逻 ...

多谢！看来正确版本我的理解是正确的

谢谢大牛对错误版本的解释，清楚多了！

[SC总结] 曼哈顿语法agree的例句疑问！

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()