ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 975|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-4-3-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-20 18:15:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-4-3-18

Dr. Schilling: Those who advocate replacing my country's private health insurance system with nationalized health insurance because of the rising costs of medical care fail to consider the high human costs that consumers pay in countries with nationalized insurance: access to high-technology medicine is restricted. Kidney transplants and open-heart surgery-rationed. People are denied their right to treatments they want and need.


Dr. Laforte: Your country's reliance on private health insurance denies access even to basic, conventional medicine to the many people who cannot afford adequate health coverage. With nationalized insurance, rich and poor have equal access to life-saving medical procedures. And people's right to decent medical treatment regardless of income is not violated.


18. Dr. Schilling's and Dr. Laforte's statements provide the most support for holding that they would disagree about the truth of which one of the following?


(A) People's rights are violated less when they are denied an available medical treatment they need because they lack the means to pay for it than when they are denied such treatment on noneconomic grounds.


(B) Where health insurance is provided by private insurance companies, people who are wealthy generally receive better health care than do people who are unable to afford health insurance.


(C) In countries that rely primarily on private health insurance to pay for medical costs, most people who would benefit from a kidney transplant receive one.


(D) In countries with nationalized health insurance, no one who needs a familiar medical treatment in order to stay alive is denied that treatment.

(a)


(E) Anyone who wants a particular medical treatment has a right to receive that treatment.


我的理解是a是L的结论,而正好与S的相反,所以两者disagree, 请问这样理解对不对呢?

沙发
发表于 2005-2-23 02:22:00 | 只看该作者
yes, but A is the conslusion of S, not of L.
板凳
发表于 2005-2-23 07:17:00 | 只看该作者

A is the point made by L, not by S.

The paraphrasing of A:

1. Either nationalisation or privatisation violates people's rights.

2. Nationalisation prevents some people from access such medical means as high-tech medication(S's point); and privatisation prevents some people from medication on eco reasons(L's point).

3. S prefers privatisation to nationalisation; L is to the contrary.

Obviously, answer a  advacates nationalisation. and L support nationalisation, also.

地板
发表于 2005-2-23 11:48:00 | 只看该作者
dphxmg, your reasoning is perfect, but I still think A is consistent with S. hehe, maybe I have been confused?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 20:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部