ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1066|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-5-4-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-17 09:55:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-5-4-18

18. “Physicalists” expect that ultimately all mental functions will be explainable in neurobiological terms. Achieving this goal requires knowledge of how neurons and their basic functions, a knowledge of how neurons interact, and a delineation of the psychological faculties to be explained. At present, there is a substantial amount of fundamental knowledge about the basic functions of neurons, and the scope and character of such psychological capacities as visual perception and memory are well understood. Thus, as the physicalists claim, mental functions are bound to receive explanations in neurobiological terms in the near future.


Which one of the following indicates an error in the reasoning in the passage?


(A) The conclusion contradicts the claim of the physicalists.


(B) The passage fails to describe exactly what is currently known about the basic functions of neurons.


(C) The word “neurobiological” is used as though it had the same meaning as the word “mental.”


(D) The argument does not indicate whether it would be useful to explain mental functions in neurobiological terms.


(E) The passage does not indicate that any knowledge has been achieved about how neurons interact.


答案为E,根据题意即if mental functions explanable ..then..knowledge of neurons and function+knowledge of interact+delinaeation.


现题意为已知上述必要条件中部分已实现从而推断充分条件mental functions explanable也即将实现,我觉得这不是典型的“Mistaken reversal”吗?答案E所指出的错误不应是主要错误啊?

沙发
发表于 2005-2-18 15:01:00 | 只看该作者

那你觉得选哪个呀


我觉得只能选E呀

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-19 09:16:00 | 只看该作者

多谢,答案是只能E,但总觉得是否我的理解有问题,没有抓住问题实质,从而问问。不知你如何理解?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 19:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部