LSAT-10-4-13,紧急求助!

This summer, Jennifer, who has worked at KVZ Manufacturing for just over three years, plans to spend with her family the entire four weeks of paid vacation to which she is entitled this year. Anyone who has worked at KVZ Manufacturing for between one and four years is automatically entitled to exactly three weeks paid vacation each year but can apply up to half of any vacation time that remains unused at the end of one year to the next year’s vacation.

If the statements above are all true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

(A) Jennifer did not use two weeks of the paid vacation time to which she was entitled past year.

(B) If Jennifer continues to work for KVZ Manufacturing, she will only be entitled to three weeks paid vacation next year.

(C) The majority of KVZ’s employees use each year all of the paid vacation time to which they are entitled.

(D) Last year Jennifer took only one week of the paid vacation time to which she was entitled.

(E) KVZ Manufacturing sometimes allows extra vacation time to employees who need to spend more time with their families.

答案是A,而我觉得都不对,如文中说,去年有一半假日可带到今年,那充其量也就1.5WEEK, 2WEEKS是怎么推出来的? 忘高手指教..这应该是纯数学题啊,难道我漏看条件了??..

但我觉得不一定!

你想,他可能去年一天没休息,导致折半后有1.5周.今年用的4周里有1.5周是去年的,2.5周是今年的,今天还剩下0.5周累计下年,难道不行吗?

这样的话A的2周不是就不成立了么?请指教!

大律师你好:

照他的逻辑,B我觉得应该也是对的,今天3周都用完了的话,她在公司工作3年,1-4年每年有3周休假,

结果是明年应该也有3周休假,难道不是么?

还是我哪里没考虑到?

1。关于答案A,不存在今年2.5周的问题，按他的条件，每年可以休3周，如果今年已休了一些，那要先将去年留下的时间扣除，直到去年剩下的时间没了，再算今年的，所以不存在2.5周的问题。

2。B确实很像答案，但问题是J只是计划，如果计划变化啦，那明年就不只是3周啦。如果计划没变化，他今年将所有假期都休啦，那他明年就只有3周假期。

我觉得答案A是没问题的，她今年有3周，还有一周肯定是去年剩下来的一半，那么去年就有两周没休。

我的问题是，如果A没问题，那么D错在哪里呢。哪个大牛指点一下

另外，B是不对的。她今年是more than 3 three years,明年就是MORE THAN 4 YEARS，不符合1—4年的政策了，也就不一定是3 WEEKS了

晓梦，也许前年剩的假期去年用了一部份