急问一篇AA！后天考！

138.

The following appeared in a memorandum to the work-group supervisors of the GBS Company.

“The CoffeeCart beverage and food service located in the lobby of our main office building is not earning enough in sales to cover its costs, and so the cart may discontinue operating at GBS. Given the low staff morale, as evidenced by the increase in the number of employees leaving the company, the loss of this service could present a problem, especially since the staff morale questionnaire showed widespread dissatisfaction with the snack machines. Therefore, supervisors should remind the employees in their group to patronize the cart — after all, it was leased for their convenience so that they would not have to walk over to the cafeteria on breaks.”

先说作者的意思。作者认为， 员工士气低下，和snack machine有关。=> 所以，公司不应该撤销Coffeecart.

大体逻辑如上。我们需要做的是驳斥这个逻辑关系，七宗罪里面至少false analogy是跑不掉的。

另外，我们不需要证明应该保留Coffeecart, 只需要驳斥上面的逻辑关系即可。

在我们的主要办公建筑的休息室内的提供饮料和食物的CoffeeCart流动车不能从销售中得到相应的收入去抵消支出。因此这个流动车可能被从GBS中取消。由于员工士气很低，这从离开公司的员工数量增加可以看出，取消这种服务可能带来问题，特别是员工士气调查显示了对快餐车的广泛不满。因此，监督应该提醒组内的雇员给流动车付款，毕竟租借流动车是为了员工的方便，使他们不用在工休时走去自助餐厅。

是不是这个题目的翻译是错误的，snackmachine并不等于coffecart?

好好的一个英语考试，干吗看中文呢?