ChaseDream
搜索
1234
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 651340199
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13 SC105中的同位语问题以及which的指代问题

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2018-7-19 08:39:18 | 只看该作者
nancyyen 发表于 2015-9-13 19:05
百度居然搜出干货。我找到了关于为什么C选项的it没有指代歧义的问题解释了,似乎是大家说的Ron 大神的答案
...

这是两个所有格的应用,是错的,of 和 ‘s 不能连用

以上言论是错误的,因为我看到了OG18-787的正确答案:C

a phenomenon that most scientists agree is caused by human beings’ burning of fossil fuels,这里GMAT是一起用的。


但是从Marconi's 的这道题来看,我搜索到了ron关于 所有格的解释:(如下),所以很迷惑,有人来解答一下RON说的到底是什么意思吗???



redable wrote:hi,

I'm wondering whether "Marconi’s conception of the radio" is a sort of "double possessive"?

thanks~

RON:

no, because 's and of are signaling completely different things.
the 's is signaling that it is marconi's idea, and not anybody else's idea.
the of is signaling that it is his idea of the radio (and not his idea of anything else).

--

to have a genuinely incorrect double possessive, both of the possessives need to be trying to fulfill exactly the same function in terms of meaning.
for instance,
tom is a friend of joe's
--> this is incorrect, since BOTH 's and of are trying to indicate the same thing (i.e., that tom is one of joe's friends, not anyone else's friend).
32#
发表于 2019-8-28 22:41:08 | 只看该作者
luckydogliuyang 发表于 2015-8-21 18:59
曼哈顿解释了一种跳跃修饰的情况,就是当主语修饰语很长而谓语修饰语或宾语较短时,为了避免将这部分放在后 ...

同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-9 08:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部