ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1281|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

同位语从句省略that

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-4-25 05:29:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
But the Court of Appeal judges said Siac had been entitled to think there was a risk the "impugned statements" would be used in evidence during a retrial and there was "a real risk of a flagrant denial of justice".

请问risk后是一个同位语从句吗?  还是 risk the "impugned statements"
如果是同位语从句that可以省略吗?? 如果是后者那又怎么解释呢

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-26 14:02:27 | 只看该作者
Mr Bloomberg said there was no evidence New York was currently a target,
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 02:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部