不好意思,lawyer, 藕又来了求教了。。。consideration 和anti-consideration在逻辑题里的区别是什么?
从字面意思理解,一个是原因,一个反原因,但具体到逻辑题中,藕就不知道如何判定了。下面一个BF题,正确答案B就出现anti-consideration. 还有一点疑问,一道逻辑题可以没有结论吗?看B的说法,整个argument就包括一个principle 和 anit-consideration. 没有conclusion..
2. A double-blind study, in which neither the patient nor the primary researcher knows whether the patient is being given the drug being tested or a placebo, is the most effective procedure for testing the efficacy of a drug. But we will not be able to perform such a study on this new drug, since the drug will have various effects on the patients’ bodies, which will make us aware of whether the patients are getting the drug or a placebo.
The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a general consideration that introduces the argument; the second is a special situation that weighs against the first. (B) The first is a general principle that is necessary for this argument; the second is an anti-consideration that the argument includes. (C) The first is a premise that this argument includes; the second is a main idea that can be drawn from this argument. (D) The first is an evidence that this argument includes; the second is a conclusion that can not be drawn from this argument. (E) The first is a general situation that supports this argument; the second is a conclusion that can be drawn from a special fact.
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-9 21:16:46编辑过] |