ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1940|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

last-1-1-23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-2 06:24:00 | 只看该作者

last-1-1-23

23.   The function of government is to satisfy the genuine wants of the masses, and government cannot satisfy those wants unless it is informed about what those wants are. Freedom of speech ensures that such information will reach the ears of government officials. Therefore, freedom of speech is indispensable for a healthy state.


Which one of the following, if true, would NOT undermine the conclusion of the argument?


(A) People most often do not know what they genuinely want.


(B) Freedom of speech tends ultimately to undermine social order, and social order is a prerequisite for satisfying the wants of the masses.


(C) The proper function of government is not to satisfy wants, but to provide equality of opportunity.


(D) Freedom of speech is not sufficient for satisfying the wants of the masses: social order is necessary as well.D


(E) Rulers already know what the people want.


我的理解是: 政府职能是满足大众需求,如果满足了大众需求,就说明政府已经获知了大众的需求.言论自由保证了政府的获知,所以言论自由是健康政府的必要条件.


satisfy wants -à informed ,                          satisfy wants 是informed的充分条件


neg(freedom of speech)-àneg( informed)                freedom  of speech 是informed 的必要条件


这样就推出neg(freedom of speech )àneg(informed)àneg(satisfy wants )        freedom of speech是satisfy wants的必要条件


但是答案D 说) Freedom of speech is not sufficient for satisfying the wants of the masses: social order is necessary as well.


Is not sufficient for ..不就是说不是必要条件嘛?

沙发
发表于 2004-12-2 07:40:00 | 只看该作者
原文的结论是: freedom of speech 是必要的(必要条件)。 D说freedom of speech 是不充分的(不是充分条件)。所以削弱不了。
板凳
发表于 2006-3-13 16:13:00 | 只看该作者

哦……

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 02:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部