ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3053|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[语文] 36套里EX22阅读求解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-8 11:43:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
EX22里面的第一个阅读 第二题
Historically, a cornerstone of classical empiricism has
been the notion that every true generalization must be
confirmable by specific observations. In classical
empiricism, the truth of ―All balls are red,‖ for example, is
assessed by inspecting balls; any observation of a non red
ball refutes unequivocally the proposed generalization.

For W.V.O. Quine, however, this constitutes an overly
―narrow‖ conception of empiricism. ―All balls are red,‖ he
maintains, forms one strand within an entire web of
statements (our knowledge); individual observations can be
referred only to this web as a whole. As new observations
are collected, he explains, they must be integrated into the
web. Problems occur only if a contradiction develops
between a new observation, say, ―That ball is blue,‖ and the
preexisting statements. In that case, he argues, any
statement or combination of statements (not merely the
―offending‖ generalization, as in classical empiricism) can
be altered to achieve the fundamental requirement, a system
free of contradictions, even if, in some cases, the alteration
consists of labeling the new observation a ―hallucination.‖

(172 words)
2. It can be inferred from the passage that Quine

considers classical empiricism to be ―overly

.narrow‘ ‖for which of the following reasons?



A Classical empiricism requires that our system

of generalizations be free of contradictions.

B Classical empiricism demands that in the case

of a contradiction between an individual

observation and a generalization, the

generalization must be abandoned.

C Classical empiricism asserts that every observation

will either confirm an existing generalization

or initiate a new generalization.
这题中A,B,C选项对应哪里啊?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-11-8 12:40:13 | 只看该作者
这题我经常选了AC,可是答案是B。。

定位:
any observation of a non red ball refutes unequivocally the proposed generalization.

B. Classical empiricism demands that in the case
of a contradiction between an individual
observation and a generalization, the
generalization must be abandoned.

意思说这empiricism说道,如果新的事物跟旧的事物产生矛盾时(不一致),这个旧的事物要被abandoned.

定位意思是说,
任何非红色的事物将会驳倒之前的说明(所有事物都是红的)
(新发现)驳倒(旧发现)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-8 13:35:49 | 只看该作者
感觉这题后面的不分都可以定位,这句话也是,可是我想请问,旧的事物一定要被abandon吗?旧的事物不能adjust吗?还有A,C选项我也都能找到定位
地板
发表于 2012-11-8 23:47:47 | 只看该作者
感觉这题后面的不分都可以定位,这句话也是,可是我想请问,旧的事物一定要被abandon吗?旧的事物不能adjust吗?还有A,C选项我也都能找到定位
-- by 会员 lyd911225 (2012/11/8 13:35:49)



不是能不能的问题,而是题目上是这个意思就是这个意思,没有假设。。
没错,看上去AC都可以定位,但认真看一下你会发现,它们都说反了。。虽然我一直选了它们。。。哎。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-28 18:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部