ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2605|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教:一道LSAT逻辑真题~E选项。。。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-14 03:14:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
We are in a new industrial revolution that requires management trainees to develop "action learning" from real experience within business and industry, rather than getting tied up with theory and academia. Business schools seem unable, on their own, to tear themselves away from their largely academic roots and move closer to the realities of today's business and industry; too often, trainees in business schools find themselves studying hypothetical cases instead of real ones. Furthermore, business schools have been slow to respond to the needs of business. Therefore, business schools should allow business executives to set curricula for management trainees that could then be taught by academics.

The argument relies on which one of the following assumptions?

A.   Academics in business schools have no practical business experience that is valuabel.

B.   Academics in business schools deal only with hypothetical situations in their business case studies.

C.   Academics are not capable of teaching curricula suitable for relevant management training.

D.   Academic training outside business schools is more responsive to the needs of business than is training within business schools.

E.   Today's business executives have valuable insight into business that academics in business schools do not have.

知道其他选项错,但是不明白正确选项E和文章的关系。。。求解释E为什么正确。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-8-14 12:13:40 | 只看该作者
Everyone can see the problem pointed out in the stimulus but how can we draw the conclusion(starts from "Therefore")? There's a gap and E fills it by explaining how business excutives can solve this problem by setting curricula. They could add something valuable from the real business world to school.
板凳
发表于 2012-8-14 22:15:02 | 只看该作者
就是说business executives 有而academics没有!!。如果academic有的话。那就不需要business executives 了!最后一句!
地板
发表于 2012-10-31 06:33:00 | 只看该作者
Apart from the last sentence, you never find the word "executives" in the stimulus. "Executives" is a new element in the conclusion, so in the right answer choice, it must have the word "executives". So we choose (E) ~~~
5#
发表于 2012-12-11 04:45:24 | 只看该作者
作者首先提出了现在商学院太过学术而脱离实际应用,最后的解决之道是邀请商界人士来制定课程,隐含的假定是:商界人士了解实际的应用
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-4 00:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部