ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4252|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教两题!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-6-30 13:44:00 | 只看该作者

求教两题!

1. [The first political passenger on mordern railroad cars were a president, a senator, and a governor that had been traveling ]to washington D.C. together on the Liberty Express in 1907.
B. The first political passenger on modern railroad cars were a president, a senator, and a governor, who traveled
E.Apresident, a senator and a governor were the first political passengers on modern railroad cars traveling
答案:B, 我觉得E更好,因为B中的who traveled 修饰对象不清楚

2. A recently proposed law would accomplish the goal of protecting Florida's manatee population without the loss of revenue from [stipulations of restrictions on the tournist and finishing industries by previously proposed laws].
C.stipulations for restrictions on the fishing industries and the tourist industry of previously proposed law.
E. restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries stipulated by previously proposed laws
答案:E, 遇到这种名词之间的强调总是做不好,有时么方法?

沙发
发表于 2003-6-30 20:19:00 | 只看该作者
1. [The first political passenger on mordern railroad cars were a president, a senator, and a governor that had been traveling ]to washington D.C. together on the Liberty Express in 1907.
B. The first political passenger on modern railroad cars were a president, a senator, and a governor, who traveled
E.Apresident, a senator and a governor were the first political passengers on modern railroad cars traveling
答案:B, 我觉得E更好,因为B中的who traveled 修饰对象不清楚

请注意:答案B "...and a governor, who traveled"中的逗号将who 和前面的隔开,从而清楚定义了"The first political passenger".
而E中的traveling指多次重复行为,显然是不妥的.
板凳
发表于 2003-7-1 01:29:00 | 只看该作者
1)选E改变了主语,也就改变的强调对象,换句话说,就是改变了原句意。
但B中我一个疑问应该是“passengers"吧
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-7-3 10:58:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢, 这下明白了! passengers,应该是吧,抄的太快了.
但第二题有什么好办法呢?

5#
发表于 2003-7-3 12:10:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lazykid在2003-7-3 10:58:00的发言:
谢谢, 这下明白了! passengers,应该是吧,抄的太快了.
但第二题有什么好办法呢?


我觉得没什么特别好的方法,最关键就是正确理解句子原意和逻辑搭配;
比如stipulation of(for) restriction就不符合逻辑,因此很容易排除这些选项。

Meaning is very important in SC!

6#
发表于 2003-7-3 12:45:00 | 只看该作者
我认为LOSS 作为中心词,它后边连接的应该RESTRICTION更符合逻辑,LOSS...FROM RESTRICTION OF ......。

同时把STIPULATION 放到后边做后置定语句子结构更合理。

7#
发表于 2003-7-3 14:49:00 | 只看该作者
第一题: travel to washington D.C. together从意思上看应该是修饰人而非cars。
第二题:复杂的名词词组结构,如何快速辨别其核心词的问题。
GMAT语法的混淆选项常常将本来应该作名词修饰语的形容词变成核心名词,这一点需要培养一定的敏感度。关键是要从语义是搞清,哪个词是修饰哪个词的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 07:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部