ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1737|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]argument138求问题中的逻辑关系

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-16 09:31:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]argument138求问题中的逻辑关系

The following appeared in a memorandum to the work-group supervisors of the GBS Company. “The CoffeeCart beverage and food service located in the lobby of our main office building is not earning enough in sales to cover its costs, and so the cart may discontinue operating at GBS. Given the low staff morale, as evidenced by the increase in the number of employees leaving the company, the loss of this service could present a problem, especially since the staff morale questionnaire showed widespread dissatisfaction with the snack machines. Therefore, supervisors should remind the employees in their group to patronize the cart --after all, it was leased for their convenience so that they would not have to walk over to the cafeteria on breaks.” Discuss how well reasoned .


文中前面说the coffeecart beverage and food service不赚钱,应取消。 后面又说员工因为dissatifaction with the snack machines,而士气低下,因此建议工头鼓励员工多光顾---- patronize the cart.


他岛地想说什么啊,前后怎么矛盾啊,不知我什么地方错了?

沙发
发表于 2004-10-17 11:22:00 | 只看该作者

不矛盾, 作者驳斥的是个驳论.

有人说coffeecart不挣钱还倒贴, 所以应该撤掉. 作者反对, 认为不应该, 理由是公司的morale和snack machines.

hehe, AA和CR本质上是一回事儿...

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-20 11:05:00 | 只看该作者

文中的转折关系太不明显了,晕。要是考这个铁定废了。

3x

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-8 17:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部