ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1097|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]LSAT-4-1-21 这段看不懂--丑闻的power

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-15 01:16:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]LSAT-4-1-21 这段看不懂--丑闻的power

看不懂incumbents 为什么要reelction? return to office 什么意思?彻底晕了。。。这段讲的是什么?



21. Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.




If the voters' reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?




沙发
发表于 2004-10-15 01:58:00 | 只看该作者
当一个政治丑闻爆发在选举前,选民大体平均地谴责各个政党,来之各个政党的现任官员寻求再选就像回到办公室(一样,没变化,原来当什麽选后还是当什麽)。但是,当选民只谴责一个政党时,来于那个政党的现任者就可能被其他政党的挑战者击败。现任者寻求再选的比例很高,并且稳定。(就是说这些人并没有被挑战者击败)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-15 11:42:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]LSAT-4-1-21 这段看不懂--丑闻的power

不愧为lawyer No.1, Lsat 专家,多谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-4 04:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部