ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2015|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文互改] ISSUE 7(政府要不要资助艺术) PIA我PIA我吧……

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-1 23:49:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
看起来字数好少。。不过确实够了,谢谢您们。。。

Should countries provide financial support to the arts? Many people are favor of it, arguing that countries’ supporting the arts will help the arts always be flourish. But others disagree, thinking that it will destroy the pure arts. Both of the two ideas are meaningful, however, as far as I am concerned, I would hold the point that countries should give financial support to the arts.

As we all know, the longer a n excellent work of art exists, the more valuable it will be. So that is why antiques all have such high price. But without financial support, how can these works still exist from past to today? Admittedly, some wealthy families would like to keep some of those great works as collections, and left these works to the next generation. However, in this way can only save few works, and a great number of the works will be ruined or even disappear. So what is a more efficient way? It is countries that could provide a lot of money to protect the works from being ruined. Also countries could collect the works which spread to the folks, avoiding missing them.

What’s more, artists need financial support, too. Some gifted artists died at an early age because of poverty, for example, Mozart, Van Golf , and so on. They can not even earn enough money to maintain their daily life, because not all the people could be able to appreciate these artists' masterpieces. And under this situation, if countries can not support their composition, the society will surely loose a great artist.

Also, the countries could constitute some galleries and theatres. Article works can enrich people’s daily life and give citizens more happiness. The works can also help children to study about the history and broaden their vision. By building up galleries and theatres, people will have more opportunities to appreciate the works of arts, so all of these relies on countries.

Surely it is necessary for countries to give financial support to the art. However, countries should not provide too much support to it. On the other word, countries should not limit the space of arts’ development. Countries are supposed to give artists free space and time to compose their works. What is more important, some excellent works can not be measured in terms of money. If countries put the labels on the works and means these works are on sale, it will threaten the integrity of the art.

From all the reasons above, It is clear that countries should provide financial support to the arts, which is very necessary. But the countries can not limit the creation of the art works, and they should never measure a masterpiece with money, which ruins the integrity of the art.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-2 07:37:51 | 只看该作者
啊。。
板凳
发表于 2012-4-2 11:36:01 | 只看该作者
countries 用government比较好
地板
发表于 2012-4-2 11:39:14 | 只看该作者
嗯,你的这个展开思路是不错的,资助艺术从几个方面入手,但你谈的不够的地方是,最后一段,本来可以作文很重要的一段,再就是作为艺术,鼓励社会力量和政府共同努力也许更好,各自发挥自己应有的作用。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-2 12:50:40 | 只看该作者
噢对的。。是有些头重脚轻了。。回去改~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-19 05:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部