ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2169|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文互改] Issue 121 求拍~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-2-24 16:41:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
121.Some people claim that you can tell whether a nationis great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, thegeneral welfare of all its people.




Anation acts as awhole composed of part of its rulers, artists and scientists, who have most ofthe power to lead the society, and part of the rest of the people, who are themajority of the society. Controversy surrounds the question of whether thenation is great determined by the achievements of its leaders or the generalwelfare of its people. In my view, these two parts are both indispensable, forwithout any the society would stop functioning.
First of all,the nation is directed most by the leaders, its politics by the rulers, cultureby the artists and military or technology development by the scientists. Theleader of the nation, like the head of a body, contains the most of its wisdomand decides for which direction the nation is heading. Whether the nation isgreat is partly determined by whether the leader is great. For example, ChineseQin Dynasty is great for its large quantity of historical relics, like theGreat Wall, which is the grandeur of China even till today. People areastounding at the wisdom of that era. However, whether the nation is great isalso determined by whether the leader could take people’s willingness intoconsideration. Take the example of Qin Dynasty again. Admittedly, from theperspective of history, the era left much for us to admire its prosperity; nevertheless,for the people in that era, the anguish people were living in may be beyond ourimagination, even though the totalitarian emperor destroyed many culturalmaterials to make people callous and fatuous in their poor condition.

However,people are another factor more important to determine how long the nation canexist. After all, the nation is mostly composed of people, each of which seemsto own little power. But it cannot be ignored that the support of people forthe government is decisive in the long river of history, for the aggregation oflittle power is marvelous to make protest to what they are opposite to. Forinstance, the regality of Qin Dynasty was eventually overturned by angrypeople, who were discontented and easily provoked to take the combats. Anotherexample is the movement which called for freedom and rights of Black peopletriggered by Martin Luther King, who were also one of the people. It can beseen that the power of people is strong enough to overwhelm the governance of anation’s leader. Therefore, a great nation should have leaders who areconsiderate to give general welfare to its people to maintain its governanceand the stability of the society.

Both leaderand people of the nation are significant for building a great nation. Withoutleader, the nation would not know where to go and how to go; without people,the governance of the leader would get nowhere and the basis of the society isdevoid. Thus, the achievements of the nation’s leaders are certainly crucial,but whether the achievements are related to the people is also decisive to thegreatness of the nation.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-2-25 01:08:05 | 只看该作者
文章中似乎理解偏了点,貌似作者谈论的是国家是由少数的领导者和大多数的普通人组成。但题目的要求是伟大国家的indicator是什么?伟大国家的象征是杰出人物的成就还是广大普通人的福利?另外the people指人民,包括进了那些杰出人物,注意下。
板凳
发表于 2012-2-27 11:51:23 | 只看该作者
第一段First of all,
第二段 however...

这不是常规出牌。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-27 17:19:59 | 只看该作者
嗯,我也觉得写得有点偏了!非常感谢!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-27 17:20:47 | 只看该作者
按常规该是怎样的?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-23 01:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部