AA138(麻烦大家!)

138. The following appeared in a memorandum to the work-group supervisors of the GBS Company.

“The CoffeeCart beverage and food service located in the lobby of our main office building is not earning enough in sales to cover its costs, and so the cart may discontinue operating at GBS. Given the low staff morale, as evidenced by the increase in the number of employees leaving the company, the loss of this service could present a problem, especially since the staff morale questionnaire showed widespread dissatisfaction with the snack machines. Therefore, supervisors should remind the employees in their group to patronize the cart — after all, it was leased for their convenience so that they would not have to walk over to the cafeteria on breaks.”

138. GBS公司的工人团体监督的备忘录：
在我们的主要办公建筑的休息室内的提供饮料和食物的CoffeeCart流动车不能从销售中得到相应的收入去抵消支出。因此这个流动车可能被从GBS中取消。由于员工士气很低，这从离开公司的员工数量增加可以看出，取消这种服务可能带来问题，特别是员工士气调查显示了对快餐车的广泛不满。因此，监督应该提醒组内的雇员给流动车付款，毕竟租借流动车是为了员工的方便，使他们不用在工休时走去自助餐厅。

我想问cart和snack machine是2个洞洞还是1个？这段话是不是说这个cart要是取消了士气就更受打击，所以要让员工多惠顾，以免取消？

谢谢大家！

1,no evidence proves that the empleyees are satisfied with coffeecart, the fact that its sales can't cover its costs maybe is because it is not a good service.

2why is it not the company that patronize the cart?if not ,may decrease the moral.

1. The arguer fails to demonstrate that the best solution for the poor coffeecart performance problem is to ask employees to patronize the cart. In fact, this action will have serious negative side effect, future decrease staff morale, in the company.

2. The evidence that employees in the company dissatisfied with the snack machine is problematic due to the nature of the questionaire.

up

我的思路：（1）low staff morale不一定是因为service不好，可能是因为公司待遇不好或者是工作压力太大；

（2）questionnaire不可信，没有具体人数，结果可能不具有代表性；

（3）即使remind the employees 去消费，员工也不会去消费，因为可能咖啡很难喝；

（4）the loss of this service 可能不是low staff morale的体现，可能就是因为东西难吃，大家都不愿意消费，才导致了loss