ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1688|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]关于比较后面的省略问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-9 03:38:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]关于比较后面的省略问题

Last year, land values in most parts of the pinelands rose almost so fast,and in some parts even faster than what they did outside the pinelands.


A so fast,and in some parts even faster than what they did


B so fast, and in some parts even faster than, those


C as fast, and in some parts even faster than, those


D as fast as, and in some parts even faster than, those


Eas fast as, and in some parts even faster than what they did


这道题的答案是D,我有一个问题想请教:为什么those 所在的比较从局不加助动词did呢。在语法书比较一章中论述为:比较从句的主语和谓语与主局的主语和谓语相同时,可以全部省去,常保留作状语的介词短语或状语从句,这里没省those, 却没加did 是什么道理呢,我做过很多比较的语法题,有的补出助动词,有的没补。这里有什么规律呢。


一个困扰好长时间的问题,希望多多指教。

沙发
发表于 2004-7-9 04:46:00 | 只看该作者

比较状语从句中的省略
在以than或as引导的比较状语从句中,如果主语与主句的主语一致,则从句主语与谓语(可以是be动词,也可以是行为动词)均可省略;如果从句的主语和主句的主语不一致,则省略其谓语及与主句相同的部分。如:
Production is going up much faster than (it was) before.
生产比以前增加得快多了。
Jane can speak Spanish more fluently than Peter (can speak).
珍妮讲西班牙语比彼得讲得流利。
Winter in Guangzhou is not so cold as in Beijing.
广州的冬天不像北京的冬天那么冷。
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=58136&page=1

So, I think "those" can be omitted. See the first and the third examples above.

板凳
发表于 2004-7-18 00:35:00 | 只看该作者
那什么情况下是从句的主语和谓语都必须补出的呢?
地板
发表于 2004-7-18 10:17:00 | 只看该作者

mianmian: 你总结的挺好,我也得出你这样的结论,只是有些复杂点的不能归类.

Jock will serve more wine to them than he will beer.

James read the book more carefully than he did the play

这是我从语法书上摘的句子.主语与主句的主语一致,但却不能省略主语.该怎么总结这些呢?谢谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-24 16:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部