og12 sc 17 这句话不符合逻辑啊？求指点

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2011-8-25 09:53:32

委员会指示广告商不要在表明食品不含色素，添加剂和合成物质时使用“自然”一词

-- by 会员 myancamel (2011/8/24 20:22:13)

Wrong translation.

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2011-8-25 09:58:11

restrict the used of "a word" to food (that ...)

So, ONLY food (that ...) can be labeled "that word."

that . . . = that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical
preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized.

Very logical.

happysun9057 · 发表于 2011-9-8 22:59:54

我觉得是这样的:
that 引到从句修饰foods，理解主干的时候把这个修饰成分先略掉，就是“委员会限制广告商对食物使用'natural'这个词”，什么样的foods呢？that后引到的从句对其进行限定性修饰，也就是不含有balabalabala的食物，也就是说，广告商对不含有balabalabala的食物使用"natural"这个词，而委员会限制了这一使用。restrict是“约束、限制”而不是“禁止”，这里是委员会做出了一个精确的定义来防止广告商的混淆视听的行为。
我觉得就是这个逻辑……

sandychen168 · 发表于 2011-9-9 00:33:44

restrict the used of "a word" to food (that ...)

So, ONLY food (that ...) can be labeled "that word."

that . . . = that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical
preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized.

Very logical.

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/8/25 9:58:11)

exactly！！！允许我再崇拜你一下，sdcar大你是大牛！！！

其实句子本身没有任何问题，是我们对于英语语言的惯用语不理解造成的歧义理解

restrict A to B意思是将A限定在B的范围之内，楼主可以去查字典，牛津上面会有

这句话的意思是：将natural这个词的使用限定在形容不含......的食物时。就是只有不含.......的食物才能使用natural这个词。

ben8995 · 发表于 2011-9-11 17:33:26

同感。

qzhang17 · 发表于 2011-12-30 09:29:48

是这样的，restrict the use to sth.

ethancjj · 发表于 2012-5-11 23:27:51

那请问选了E，用and为什么不行？？
restrict to food that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, and anything that has been synthesized
那么请问
1.restrict to food that do not contain color and flavor additives, chemical preservatives, and anything that has been synthesized
和
2.restrict to food that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized
这两句话有什么不同啊？？？？

clair1107 · 发表于 2012-7-5 10:59:01

那请问选了E，用and为什么不行？？
restrict to food that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, and anything that has been synthesized
那么请问
1.restrict to food that do not contain color and flavor additives, chemical preservatives, and anything that has been synthesized
和
2.restrict to food that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized
这两句话有什么不同啊？？？？

-- by 会员 ethancjj (2012/5/11 23:27:51)

否定句中， not caused by A,B and C (意味不是由A,B,C的组合而引起的)
而 not caused by A, B or C(意味着不是由A或B或C任何一个引起的)

fpd · 发表于 2012-11-10 21:49:33

请问大侠，为什么前两个是只把color 和chemical这两个并列了呢？

og12 sc 17 这句话不符合逻辑啊？求指点

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()