妈的，这题弄了半天，只能心痛的表示，答案是不是要把封号前后两句弄反了，if comma那句在前。按原来没有逗号的结构，creating修饰几百年也修饰不到lying头上去，咱得勇于挑战GMAC狗屎的解释，GMAC全家awkward and wordy... -- by 会员 yuha1111 (2012/3/13 0:58:01)
我指这位大哥的回复，太有幽默感了 -- by 会员 bingblbing (2012/8/3 7:19:07)
UP. But still, back to the question: 问题是在no comma的情况下，OG说ving它修饰的是 lying ！？
-- by 会员 vianfq (2012/8/7 20:07:14)
这位大哥回复的意思是：把这两句到个顺序看，if use as participal,creating would have to be preceded by comma,(but)creating seems to refer back to lying.
大哥一句话，点醒梦中人啊~~~ | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-8-3 07:17:54
