ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: neolqy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-12 OG12版第12题

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2011-3-4 22:41:13 | 只看该作者
这个问题我可以回答。根据manhatton第四版那本书上写。adv+a+n没错的。adv这里修饰a。还有一种a+a+n也是ok的,这里2个形容词都修饰n。
而本文D的错误是主谓不一致,另外这里用increased不好。应该用increase in sales。increased有已经增加过了的意思,还有被动意思。

OG11-8
Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.

A)When unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
B)When not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
C)When they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
D)If not accompanied by correspondingly increased slaes, possibly leads
E) If not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead


问题:D项  correspondingly increased slaes  - 结构为: adv + adj + n

OG解释:correspondingly increased slaes  这种修辞方式本身awkward and unclear,请问什么地方awkward and unclear?
或者E的正确答案corresponding increases in slaes是一种习惯用法?

但是,相反的例子比如:OG11-38
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.
(A)    seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B)    seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C)    seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D)    seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E)    seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at   (E)

正确答案E中 seemingly unlimited number of antibodies  结构却为:adv + adj + n

另外一个相反的例子,OG11-69

69. A report by the American Academy for the Advancement of Science has concluded that much of the currently uncontrolled dioxins to which North Americans are exposed comes from the incineration of wastes.

(A)         much of the currently uncontrolled dioxins to which North Americans are exposed comes

(B)         much of the currently uncontrolled dioxins that North Americans are exposed to come

(C)        much of the dioxins that are currently uncontrolled and that North Americans are exposed to comes

(D)        many of the dioxins that are currently uncontrolled and North Americans are exposed to come

(E)         many of the currently uncontrolled dioxins to which North Americans are exposed come  (E)

正确答案E中currently uncontrolled dioxins  结构也为:adv + adj + n

请问adv + adj + n结构是否awkward and unclear?
-- by 会员 lu80 (2010/9/14 20:50:38)

12#
发表于 2013-9-13 12:14:04 | 只看该作者
lhf80 发表于 2011-3-4 22:41
这个问题我可以回答。根据manhatton第四版那本书上写。adv+a+n没错的。adv这里修饰a。还有一种a+a+n也是ok ...

有道理!
13#
发表于 2015-12-6 23:56:27 | 只看该作者
此题不能用when,原题中when引导的not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales不是一定会发生的情况。
贴上Manhattan Ron关于when/if的解释:

If your "conditional sentence" depends on something that occurs at a specific time, then "when" can be used to express the whole conditional idea.

You can't use when if ...
1. Something is NOT an event that occurs at a specific point in time。
Ex: If you are a woman, the older executives may not speak to you as honestly as they will to me.
("When you are a woman" is nonsense, unless someone has the ability to change back and forth between sexes.)
2. The consequence doesn't occur at the time of the conditional part
Ex: If you smoke cigarettes, you will die of cancer.
"When you smoke cigarettes" doesn't work here, since you won't die when you smoke the cigarettes"”you'll die decades later.

If the time relationship is appropriate, though, "when" is more descriptive than "if", because it's more precise.
Ex: When you return the goods, you'll receive a refund.
You'll receive your refund at the time when you return the goods"”i.e., not later.
Ex: If you return the goods, you'll receive a refund.
This sentence is more vague about the timeline. You might get the refund when you actually return the goods"”but you might get it much later.

The primary difference between "if" and "when" is that "when" implies that the precipitating event will definitely happen.
Ex: When I eat white rice, I can easily eat too much, because pure starch isn't filling.
If I eat white rice, I can easily eat too much, because pure starch isn't filling.
These two sentences express the same possibility of overeating. The difference is that the first one ("When I eat white rice") implies that there are definitely occasions on which I eat white rice, while the second one makes no such implication.
I could make the second statement even if I know I'll never eat white rice again.
14#
发表于 2020-10-7 13:45:53 | 只看该作者
seeingyou 发表于 2015-12-6 23:56
此题不能用when,原题中when引导的not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales不是一定会发生的 ...

看一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-22 11:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部