ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2946|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教like和as...do的区别

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-30 16:37:00 | 只看该作者

请教like和as...do的区别

104. Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the stars, and hydrogen bombs, merging the
                nuclei of atoms and not splitting them apart, as
                in nuclear reactors.

(A)      merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear reactors

(B)      merging the nuclei of atoms instead of splitting them apart, like nuclear reactors

(C)      merging the nuclei of atoms rather than splitting them apart, as nuclear reactors do

(D)      and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not split them apart, as is done in nudear reactors

(E)      and merges the nuclei of atoms, unlike atomic reactors that split them apart

100Proponents of artificial intelligence say they will be able to make computers that can understand English and other human languagesrecognize objectsand reason as an expert does--computers that will be used to diagnose equipment breakdowns, deciding whether to authorize a loanor other purposes such as these

(A)  as an expert does-computers that will be used to diagnose equipment breakdownsdeciding whether to authorize a loanor other purposes such as these

(B)  as an expert doeswhich may be used for purposes such as diagnosing equipment breakdowns or deciding whether to authorize a loan

(C)  like an expert-computers that will be used for such purposes as diagnosing equipment breakdowns or deciding whether to authorize a loan

(D)  like an expertthe use of which would be for purposes like the diagnosis of equipment breakdowns or the decision whether or not a loan should be authorized

(E)  like an expertto be used to diagnose equipment breakdownsdeciding whether to authorize a loan or notor the like

第一题选C,og解释说要对动作进行比较。

第二题选C,看了以前的问答,似乎很多人也认为C更好,like是直接对expert和computer来比较。

我的疑问是,第二题看起来更像是比较动作啊,前面列了一大串动作,而且“reason like an expert"这里"do like sb"这个结构也看起来很怪不是吗?我觉得更顺口的是"do as sb do"。

请不吝赐教,谢谢。

沙发
发表于 2008-7-31 04:38:00 | 只看该作者

BY书里的规律:

like + n. 表比较

(just)as + n. 表作为

(just)as + sb do 表比较

such as + n./ing短语  表举例

like 这个词在GAMT里不能够表示举例。

或许上面的规律能够帮楼主理解这个题目。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-1 16:11:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢。

正如你所说的,like + n. 表比较,(just)as + sb do 表比较

同样是表比较,有何区别呢?

地板
发表于 2008-8-1 16:25:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵

LZ好好看下啊~

like后面接的是名词,性质像

act后面接的是句子,动作像

 

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-1 16:31:00 | 只看该作者

那么我举例的第二题呢?

感觉明明是动作的对比啊?

6#
发表于 2008-8-1 17:46:00 | 只看该作者

让LZ弄糊涂了,这里的reason是动词,与understand和recognize并列,like是介词,that是expert-computer的同位语

完了,绕迷糊了

7#
发表于 2008-8-1 18:59:00 | 只看该作者

as后面接 词

act后面接 句子 既然是句子就要主谓宾齐全

 

8#
发表于 2008-8-1 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

谈一下对104题的看法。

我原来是选B的,但是看了答案之后才知道为何自己错了,为何不能用like,一定要用as...do

因为使用like的话,比较对象就比较模糊了,就不知道这个nuclear reactors是同nuclear fusion is the force作比较,还是同nuclear fusion merging...作比较。而如果使用as...do...则很明确,这是同merging比较,否则就应该加as...is...同is the force部分作比较。

这只是我自己的灼见,还望大家指正。

我做语法题,最害怕就是做语法的比较题,虽然很多人都说比较是最简单的,不过这对于我来说是一个难点,经常要错。无奈中...

9#
发表于 2016-10-15 15:20:58 | 只看该作者
时隔8年的漫长岁月,我再来回个帖,与carroline的观点一致,对于100题,如果选择as + SV的结构,that can understand…recognize…and reason as an expert does,这样的搭配有歧义,会理解成,计算机能理解英语,识别物体以及逻辑推理,像一个专家那样去理解英语,识别物体和逻辑推理,而like an expert, 这里的like不是比较,(计算机推理时候如何如何,专家推理时如何如何),而是像,也就是计算机推理时就像一个专家,于是不能用as + SV,更不能用as an expert, 这个往往用于真实无差别的事物,比如the scientist reasons as a lawyer, 尽管很多科学家确实不是律师,但不能妨碍一个人即是科学家又是律师,比如这里就是说这个科学家推理时就是一个律师,而且是真的就是。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-22 21:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部