ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 948|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

AA106 帮忙找找攻击点吧。。。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-6 14:37:00 | 只看该作者

AA106 帮忙找找攻击点吧。。。

106. The following appeared as part of a business plan by the Capital Idea Investment firm.
“Currently more and more books are becoming available in electronic form — either free of charge on the Internet or for a very low price per book on CD-ROM.* People who would not pay bookstore prices will now have access to whatever book they want from their home or work computers. Consequently, literary classics are likely to be read more widely than ever before: 72 percent of those responding to a recent online survey said they would read books in electronic form, and 81 percent said they believed that reading classic works was important. Given this newly developing market, we should invest in E-Classics, a new company that sells electronic versions of literary classics.”
*A CD-ROM is a small portable disc capable of storing relatively large amounts of data that can be read by a computer.

我就觉得survey有问题,其他貌似满有道理的。。。

沙发
发表于 2008-5-8 09:59:00 | 只看该作者

“Currently more and more books are becoming available in electronic form — either free of charge on the Internet or for a very low price per book on CD-ROM.* People who would not pay bookstore prices will now have access to whatever book they want from their home or work computers.

越来越多书的电子版出现并不代表所有书都有电子版,在电脑上随便想看哪一本就看哪一本是不现实的。

Consequently, literary classics are likely to be read more widely than ever before: 72 percent of those responding to a recent online survey said they would read books in electronic form, and 81 percent said they believed that reading classic works was important.

问卷调查的结果并不能表明人们阅读经典文学作品比以前多,因为:一,72%的人愿意阅读在线书籍,并不代表他们真的阅读了;更何况并没有说明问卷的样本是怎样的,是所有人还是仅仅是爱看书的人,如果仅仅是爱看书的人,这个调查问卷是不具代表性的。二,81%的人说他们认为看经典文学作品重要,并不代表他们看了,同时样本也不清晰。

Given this newly developing market, we should invest in E-Classics, a new company that sells electronic versions of literary classics.”
*A CD-ROM is a small portable disc capable of storing relatively large amounts of data that can be read by a computer.

前面的理由并不充分,所以这个结论并不准确。同时这个结论只从读者方面考虑,没有从作者方面考虑,免费或低价电子书籍并不足以支付作者付出的劳动,此外,电子文件易被复制,作者的版权问题也难得到保证。因此,简单地得出“我们应该投入资金开发电子书籍”的结论是考虑不周全的。

我也是新人,以上只是我的想法仅供参考~~一起努力啦~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-10 16:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部