ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2121|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山ZT一套 31

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-22 21:23:00 | 只看该作者

天山ZT一套 31

31.Scholars who once thought Native American literatures were solely oral narratives recorded by missionaries or anthropologists now understand this body of work to consist of both oral literatures and the written works of Native American authors, who have been publishing since 1772.
A.Scholars who once thought Native American literatures were solely oral narratives
C.Scholars who once had thought of Native American literatures solely as oral narratives and  
答案:A
难道think 后面不需要that 也可以接宾语从句吗?
C中的once 一般接一般过去时的动作,可以用于过去完成时吗?and 是否有问题呢?

我上次问过的一个问题predict 在题中没加that, 所以我没有选A。A符合predict that 的习惯用法。
请问各位大牛,如果考试时题目中出现一个有多种用法的词,比如上面的think,
think的习语:
think that       think of sth as sth            think of sth to be adj
题目中没出现that, 但它的答案就要选think that 这种表达,而选项中还有它的其它习惯搭配。这是一种习惯吗?


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-22 21:25:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
发表于 2003-12-22 21:38:00 | 只看该作者
一般宾语从句都要加 that,但不加不一定错。所以这是个弱的区分点,排除选项主要不能靠这个。

    C中的and错,因为recorded by missionaries or anthropologists 明显修饰oral narratives
用and莫名其妙,讲不通(个人观点)

    关于think的习语:我只知道前面两个,最后那个有吗???

    关于用哪个习语的问题,我的观点是,不要靠一个本身就比较模糊的知识点来判断选项是否正确
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-22 21:49:00 | 只看该作者
14.With cloning technology, scientists are approaching what has long been the ultimate goal of modern husbandry: achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be limited to manufactured goods.
(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be
(B) achieving farm animals with a consistency of quality and production as were once thought of as
(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be
(D) achievement of farm animals whose consistency of quality and production are the same as what were once thought to he
(E)achievement of farm animals at a consistency of quality and production once thought of as
答案:C
我由此认为think sth to be adj
请指教!
5#
发表于 2003-12-22 22:01:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得不是这样: sth thought to be limited to,我觉得这里是不定式的被动形式

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-24 18:21:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢 dreadpower GG!: )
7#
发表于 2004-1-11 11:41:00 | 只看该作者
bucuo
8#
发表于 2004-1-11 11:42:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-19 13:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部