[讨论]关于小作文 找3点 的问题 欢迎发表看法

  不知道 大家有没有这种感觉 有些练习的小作文的3 点并 不好找.

 撇开 巴朗 DELTA 这些（新东方老师都说这些出的乱七八糟） 来说 ETS样题 里面那个MEERCAT 我也感觉找不出来准确的3个点

感觉 其实每一个点 它都是在 反驳的

 怎么分出那3点？   很多牛牛们 说 把纸 弄成2半 一半三个观点 分别来自阅读和听力 让我很晕 为什么我总感觉是全方位反驳 那些细节什么的怎么处理

阿？  我写了 一篇 感觉很乱 请大家指点

 In the reading material, the author states that teams have so many advantages in finishing projects. To start with, there are more people involved in discussion, so there will be more knowledge, more expertise and more skills that are valuable. In contrast, the professor in the listening argues that some people just get a free-ride. They don not make any contribution but they can get the same benefits as the people who make a big contribution. There are only a small percentage of people really working hard.

  In the listening material, the professor stated that to make a decision, teams usually spend more time as they have to discuss again and again to make a compromise outcome. However, the reading argues that teams can be quick in response. Furthermore, the listening also argues that when the influential people in the team think of an idea. The idea will be considered qualified without much discussion. However, common people’s opinions are often ignored as people usually do not think much of them. In other words, the responsibility does not spread averagely .This directly contradicted what the reading passage commented.

  According to the reading material, individual can better show themselves as the results carried out by teams have grater impacts. However, the professor holds an opposite opinion. These influential people usually dominate the decision making, while common people do not have the chance to shine.

 In conclusion, the listening refutes the reading.

我自己感觉有几点：1 不是3点 是一堆 虽然努力想把它扯成点

                               2 不是对应的 除了那个  团队作决定更快还是更慢 是 正面交锋， 其他的可能对错了点。

                              3 模板是不是太简单了

 然后 我是高二嘛， 周围有同学这个作文很“轻易”地的了满分， 我想，是不是我们大家都争取 这样的结果 呵呵

              欢迎讨论！