- UID
- 271128
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2007-9-1
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
初练写作3篇,请指正
1. "It is essential that the nations of the world increase spending on the building of space stations and on the exploration of other planets, even if that means spending less on other government programs." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Space exploration has recently come up again as a hot topic of business magazines since China and Japan launched their rockets to the Moon. Obviously the nations all over the world are spending more and more on the space race. Under this situation, the speaker is even proposing to spend more money, which should have been used on other government programs, on the building of space stations and on the exploration of other planets. In my view, this is a violation of the basic interest of human being.
First of all, space exploration is not on the top-5 list of any government's duties. Even in one of the most developed nations, the United States, there are still quite a few people living in poverty, suffering diseases, and looking for the lowest-paid jobs. Poverty, health care, security against terrorism, discrimination, illegal immigrants, ... any of them should take precedence over the exploration of the space. None of the President candidates will talk more about how to support NASA than how to change the health insurance system, because they all know what the priority should be.
Admittedly, all the space exploration actions assume some kind of research tasks and would potentially benefit the whole world (or at least said so). However, any government should think twice about the ratio of production and invest before spending the money coming from its taxpayers. At the same time we hear that NASA spends around $500 million for each spacecraft, we have noticed that the government has been become less supportive to our higher education. The magazine "Education Digest" said "it has become harder for the first-generation college students" because their parents did not get higher education and could not earn enough money to afford their higher education, due to the less support of the government. More and more genuine young people have been suffering the education loan, and some of them may have to go to Iraq in order to get the opportunity of higher education. It is hard to understand why the government cannot spend more money on the more controllable education program that has been and will be undoubtedly beneficial to the whole society and the future generations.
When we look further to the whole world, we have found a very unfortunate situation that the nations have been spending a lot of resources on space exploration, just as what they have been trying to do on developing nuclear weapons. Obviously, the fear of losing potential control of the space resources has been pushing the nations' governments to ignore the more compelling problems and needs in their nations and spend more on the game, or the race, of space exploration.
The space is full of potential opportunities for the human being. However, if the same amount of resource could be spent on food production, energy reservation, pollution prevention and fight with drug trafficking, I believe the whole world will benefit more than what we have been told from the space exploration.
|
|