ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1281|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

写AI130 提纲+正文,请NN指导

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-5 19:12:00 | 只看该作者

写AI130 提纲+正文,请NN指导

130. “When judging the qualifications of potential employees, business employers should rely primarily on objective information, such as a candidate’s résumé and education. Personal interviews are much too subjective and are therefore not a valid basis on which to judge a person’s qualifications for a job.”

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

“当评价一个潜在雇员的条件的时候,企业雇主应该主要依赖诸如推荐信和教育程度之类的客观信息。个人鉴定太过主观因此不是评判一个人是否对一份工作称职的有效依靠。”
    

*******************

Date: 2007-7-5

Time: 17:44

Issue No.130

********************

 

 

 

另外想问NN:像我这样partially agree会不会显得没有论点呢?

 

 

另外想问NN:像我这样partially agree会不会显得没有论点呢?

1、客观信息非常有用,一方面可以帮助企业筛选候选人,比如挑选适合工作岗位的专业,举例CMA例子;另一方面客观信息往往真实可信,比如推荐信,举了一个虚例

2、然而客观信息并不能提供一个申请人深度信息,可能这个人并不适合,举虚例;再从雇主角度,变化多端的世界需要用面试全面考核一个申请人的个人特质;

3、不可否认,面试有缺点,但这只是停留在理论推理上,不要忘了那些专家不是吃素的,他们也开发了很多方法避免这些缺点;

综上所述,我不完全同意作者的观点,一个比较合理的方法是综合面试和客观材料。

 

 

另外想问NN:像我这样partially agree会不会显得没有论点呢?

Business employers are always talking about the issue of how to judge the qualifications of a potential empoloyee. The author of this statement recommend that employers should rely primarily on objective inforrmation rather than on subjective information. As far as I am concerned, I partially agree this assertion.

Business employers are always talking about the issue of how to judge the qualifications of a potential empoloyee. The author of this statement recommend that employers should rely primarily on objective inforrmation rather than on subjective information. As far as I am concerned, I partially agree this assertion.

 

 

First and formost, Admittedly, objective information such as resume ,education certificate and recommendation letter is very important for judging a potential employee.This kind of information can provide a soild ground to testify an applicant’s qualification. For example, when a consultant firm wants to find an excellent accountant, a CMA (Certified Management Accountant) certificantion of an applicant could ensure that he or she worths this seat. On the other hand, objective information could help employers to do initial filtration of candidates. For example, Consider a situation that there are too many applicants who compete for a few positions in a firm, objective information could provide a comparision standard by which HR department could accelerate the process of filtration of applicants.

 

 

Secondly, However emplyers can not talk to resume and education certificate and thus can not know in-depth informaiton about how an applicant behaved in study or in previous work, what he or she values, or what really motivates him or her. As we know, motivation and vaule are impotant to predict a potential of certain candidate. For instance,In our company, A man who graduated from the Stanford Business School worked for a few months and then chose to leave because he felt that he can not accumtom to our company culture. Additionally, On the point of view of employer, Personal interview could help employers to do a comprehensive examination of an applicant’s personal characters such as optimistic, positive,and team spirit which are needed In today capricious world.

 

 

The last but not least, You might object that a personal interview is too short of period of time to provide comprehensivly reflect entire qualities of an applicants. I agree, just as author of this statement said that personal interviews are much too subjective and are therefore not a valid basis on which to judge a person’s qualifications for a job. However, we can not forgo interview method only because interviewer are potential subjective. In principle, we have to take this possiblity into account. In reality, we can not ignore that human resourece theorists has developed many scientific interview methods which eliminate the possibility of subjectiveness in the interview. Moreover, many concrete cases has illustrated that scientific interviews are good assessment tools with high validity.

 

 

To sum up, I am partially agree the author’s assertion that employers should rely primarily on objective inforrmation rather than on subjective information. To ensure good result, business employers should instead take a balanced approach. By a balanced approach I mean paying attention to both the objective information and personal interviews to select candidates.

像 这个文章能拿4.5不:)


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-5 19:12:30编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-7-5 19:57:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fansiyg在2007-7-5 19:12:00的发言:

Business employers are always talking about the issue of how to judge the qualifications of a potential empoloyee. The author of this statement recommend that employers should rely primarily on objective inforrmation rather than on subjective information. As far as I am concerned, I partially agree this assertion(You should raise your point).

First and formost, Admittedly, objective information such as resume ,education certificate and recommendation letter is very important for judging a potential employee.This kind of information can provide a soild ground to testify(actually, interview is used to testify the paper material) an applicant’s qualification. For example, when a consultant firm wants to find an excellent accountant, a CMA (Certified Management Accountant) certificantion of an applicant could ensure that he or she worths this seat. On the other hand, objective information could help employers to do initial filtration(Filtration is the process of filtering a substance. not suitable here) of candidates. For example, Consider a situation that there are too many applicants who compete for a few positions in a firm, objective information could provide a comparision standard by which HR department could accelerate the process of filtration of applicants.

Secondly, However emplyers can not talk to resume and education certificate and thus can not know in-depth informaiton about how an applicant behaved in study or in previous work, what he or she values, or what really motivates him or her. As we know, motivation and vaule are impotant to predict a potential of certain candidate. For instance,In our company, A man who graduated from the Stanford Business School worked for a few months and then chose to leave because he felt that he can not accumtom to our company culture. Additionally, On(From) the point of view of employer, Personal interview could help employers to do a comprehensive examination of an applicant’s personal characters such as optimistic, positive(you should use the noun form here),and team spirit which are needed In
                today('s) capricious world.

you can use they/them to replace he/she/him/her

you can use they/them to replace he/she/him/her

The last but not least, You might object that a personal interview is too short of period of time to provide comprehensivly reflect entire qualities of an applicants. I agree, just as author of this statement said that personal interviews are much too subjective and are therefore not a valid basis on which to judge a person’s qualifications for a job(incomplete sentence). However, we can not forgo interview method only because interviewer are
                potential(ly) subjective. In principle, we have to take this possiblity into account. In reality, we can not ignore that human resourece theorists has developed many scientific interview methods which eliminate the possibility of subjectiveness in the interview. Moreover, many concrete cases has illustrated that scientific interviews are good assessment tools with high validity.

To sum up, I am partially agree the author’s assertion that employers should rely primarily on objective inforrmation rather than on subjective information. To ensure good result, business employers should instead take a balanced approach. By a balanced approach I mean paying attention to both the objective information and personal interviews to select candidates.

像 这个文章能拿4.5不:)


PLEASE use WORD to check the spelling and grammer.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-5 20:43:00 | 只看该作者

真想找个地缝钻进去,不是细心的问题了,是态度了问题了,我明白差在哪里了,谢谢,真的谢谢RIO版主

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-5 21:18:00 | 只看该作者

按照rio版主的批示,又认真改正了apparent 的语法和拼写错误,感觉AWA真的要动笔写啊,否则SC多好,都可能犯很多低级的错误,唉,惭愧。

Business employers are always talking about the issue of how to judge the qualifications of a potential employee. The author of this statement recommends that employers should rely primarily on objective inforrmation rather than on subjective information. As far as I am concerned, I partially agree this assertion. Eithor objective or subjective information has advantages and disadvantages in judging a potential applicant. A combination of two type information might help employers to better assess a applicant.

 

First and foremost, Admittedly, objective information such as resume,education certificate and recommendation letter is very important in judging a potential employee.This kind of information can provide a soild ground to check an applicant’s qualification. For example, when a consultant firm wants to find an excellent accountant, a CMA (Certified Management Accountant) certificantion of an applicant could ensure that he or she worths this seat. On the other hand, objective information could help employers to do primary election of candidates. For example, Consider a situation that there are too many applicants who compete for a few positions in a firm, objective information could provide a comparision standard by which HR department could accelerate the process of primary election of applicants.

 

Secondly, However emplyers can not talk to resume and education certificate and thus can not know in-depth informaiton about how applicants behaved in study or in previous work, what they values, or what really motivates them. As we know, motivations and vaules are important to assess a potential of certain candidate. For instance,In our company, A man who graduated from the Stanford Business School worked for a few months and then chose to leave because he felt that he can not become accumtomed to our company culture. Additionally, From the point of view of employers, Personal interview could help employers to do a comprehensive examination of an applicant’s personal characters such as optimistic mind, positive atitude,and team spirit which are needed In today’s capricious world.

 

The last but not least, some people might object that a personal interview is too short of period of time to comprehensivly reflect entire qualities of an applicants. I agree, just as author of this statement said, personal interviews are much too subjective and are therefore not a valid basis on which to judge a person’s qualifications for a job. However, we can not forgo interview method only because interviewers are potentially subjective. In principle, Personal interview methods have many demerits. In reality, we can not ignore that human resourece theorists have developed many scientific interview methods which eliminate the possibility of subjectiveness in the interview. Moreover, many concrete cases have illustrated that scientific interviews are good assessment tools with high validity.

 

To sum up, I partially agree the author’s assertion that employers should rely primarily on objective inforrmation rather than on subjective information. To ensure a good result, business employers should instead take a balanced approach. By a balanced approach I mean paying attention to both the objective information and personal interviews to select candidates.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-7 06:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部