ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1916|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]作文写不出来怎么办?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-21 22:59:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]作文写不出来怎么办?

    复习GMAT快7个月了。数学,语文都差不多了。就是作文不行,也练了不少时间,背新概念4,看范文,看economist, 也写了一些文章。但是还是差的

很远,只要换一个题目就不会写了。另外,有时还不太会用词。难道练习GMAT作文真的要一点一点积累,没有什么技巧吗?请帮帮忙 有什么好的方法和

技巧吗?如果没有,那我就好好练了。而且,我看到网上很多人说背模版,但是我总觉得没有什么模版能适用于一切文章呀

       谢谢!

13. “Responsibility for preserving the natural environment ultimately belongs to each individual person, not to government.”

The speaker asserts that each person should assume the responsibility for preserving environment initiatively and doesn’t dependent government. But in my point of view, with the developing of the industries and economy in the past 200 years, environment issue is more and more severe because government doesn’t assume its responsibility correspondently.

My main reason for rejecting the speaker’s position is that government usually promotes economy development at the expense of environment in the past. For example, over the past four decades, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at Congress' request has been siphoning water out of the everglades to build canals and increase agricultural and urban development. The effort has   resulted in decrease of everglades area and the loss of many indigenous plants and animals. As the evident noted above, how can an individual prohibit the trend? In my experience, government at first must realize the important of environment protection and don’t develop economy at the expense of environment.

My second reason is that environment issue is very complexity. It involves many people’s interests inevitably. Government, as the manager of society, should make some environmental policies to encourage people preserve environment. For example, government can encourage investors invest more money on projects which is contribute to decrease pollution and to improve environment by tax policy. And it also can penalize the companies which pollute rivers or emit chemistry gases. But a person cannot do it.

Those who support speaker’s view might point out that environmental issue can‘t solve, if every individuals don’t want to protect environment. Therefore each person has responsibility for preventing pollution. Yet, power of one individual is limited. The function of government cannot substitute. For instance, how a person prohibits this action? If a power plant emits excessively greenhouse gases such as carbon-dioxide. And do we expect every person plant a tree when a country want to increase its area of forest? It is unrealistic obviously. Government plays a more vital role on environmental issue, not individual.

In sum, human should expect every nations’ governments exert more function if hope global environment becomes better and better. Government should realize environment issue is as important as economic development and make environment policies to encourage individual as well as business protect environment and to penalize people who destroy environment.
   

这是我写的,请指点! 谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-21 23:45:42编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-6-21 23:20:00 | 只看该作者

写一篇拿出来看看吧

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-27 15:12:00 | 只看该作者

请各位帮帮忙好吗?谢谢了!现在为了作文。我真是很头疼。请NN帮我指一条明路呀?

地板
发表于 2007-7-1 23:41:00 | 只看该作者

我今天刚好也写了这篇,以前有准备过模板,但是跟LZ一样觉得模板未必适合所有题目,所以这篇就没按模板,很简单的写了一下,LZ有的困惑我全都有,这篇我写了一个多小时,其间还查字典找单词用,不会用单词啊。

Some politic men say that responsibility for preserving the natural environment ultimately belongs to each individual person, not to government. Some people will debate that preserving the natural environment is one of the most important duties of the government but not of each individual. Others may buttress the politic men and cite that each individual should do a lot for preserving the natural environment, or our environment will become worse and worse even if our government do its best. While thinking about these two views, I assure that each individual must sacrifice to preserve the natural environment under the government's leading and show why I hold this point in the later discuss.

 

 

 

In one hand, preserving the natural environment is belongs both each individual and government. Preserving the natural environment is relate to all of us, because we all live in the same world and because any little change of the natural environment will lead to a grievous result and affect us more, such as rising temperature, extinction of some creatures. Therefore, it is no doubt that each individual has responsibility for preserving the natural environment. But, we can not neglect that every individual has a self interest and is interested on the short-term economic profit, so individual will not pay more attention on preserving the natural environment while this preservation will lead to his/her losing something. Further more, individual is able to do only a little for environment, but preserving the natural environment is an enormous target for which all people on the Earth work hard, so that organizing individuals by government is inevitable.

 

 

 

In the other hand, policy made by government to preserve the natural environment must be sustained by most individuals. At the beginning, we would make an evident blunder if we insist that preserving the natural environment is one of the most important mission of government in its tour of duty and that the preservation is not the business of any individual. In the last paragraph, however, I have show that preserving the natural environment is event of all human being. Secondly, no matter what that perspective is basing, it is doubtless that no policy of any government can reach its expected aim without participations of its civilian. That is to say, any individual can affect the final result of government’s policy, so each individual should give a hand for preserving the natural environment. For example, China has appeal that people ought to plant more trees in order to improve our environment, and so China adds billions of trees every year with most of Chinese participating (原为名词,改为动名词,妥否?)of this plan.

 

 

 

In conclusion, I assert that it is not wisdom to say that responsibility for preserving the natural environment ultimately belongs to each individual person, not to government. In fact, preserving the natural environment ultimately belongs to every individual person, and government must do its best on organizing its civilian to reach the target――preserving the natural environment.

高手顺路指点一下


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-1 23:56:08编辑过]
5#
发表于 2007-7-2 01:05:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wingkim在2007-7-1 23:41:00的发言:

我今天刚好也写了这篇,以前有准备过模板,但是跟LZ一样觉得模板未必适合所有题目,所以这篇就没按模板,很简单的写了一下,LZ有的困惑我全都有,这篇我写了一个多小时,其间还查字典找单词用,不会用单词啊。

Some politic men say that responsibility for preserving the natural environment ultimately belongs to each individual person, not to (the) government. Some people will debate that preserving the natural environment is one of the most important duties of the government but not of each individual. Others may buttress the politic men and cite that each individual should do a lot for preserving the natural environment, or our environment will become worse and worse even if our government do its best. While thinking about these two views, I assure that each individual must sacrifice to preserve the natural environment under the government's leading and show why I hold this point in the later discuss.

In one hand(On the one hand), preserving the natural environment is belongs both each individual and government. Preserving the natural environment is relate(related) to all of us, because we all live in the same world and because any little change of the natural environment will lead to a grievous result and affect us more, such as rising temperature, extinction of some creatures. Therefore, it is no doubt that each individual has responsibility for preserving the natural environment. But, we can not neglect that every individual has a self interest and is interested on the short-term economic profit, so individual will not pay more attention on preserving the natural environment while this preservation will lead to his/her losing something(cause some loss to individual). Further more(Furthermore), individual is able to do only a little for environment, but preserving the natural environment is an enormous target for which all people on the Earth work hard, so that organizing individuals by government is inevitable.

In(On) the other hand, policy made by government to preserve the natural environment must be sustained by most individuals. At the beginning, we would make an evident blunder if we insist that preserving the natural environment is one of the most important mission(missions) of government in its tour of duty and that the preservation is not the business of any individual. In the last(previous) paragraph, however, I have show(shown) that preserving the natural environment is (an) event of all human being. Secondly, no matter what that perspective is basing, it is doubtless that no policy of any government can reach its expected aim without participations of its civilian. That is to say, any individual can affect the final result of government’s policy, so each individual should give a hand for preserving the natural environment. For example, China has appeal(appealed) that people ought to plant more trees in order to improve our environment, and so China adds billions of trees every year with most of Chinese participating (原为名词,改为动名词,妥否?)of this plan. (actually the meaning of this sentence is vague, you can delete "of this plan")

In conclusion, I assert that it is not wisdom to say that responsibility for preserving the natural environment ultimately belongs to each individual person, not to government. In fact, preserving the natural environment ultimately belongs to every individual person, and government must do its best on organizing its civilian to reach the target――preserving the natural environment.

高手顺路指点一下


use more substitutes for "natural environment"

the last paragraph is not clear in conveying your main idea

6#
发表于 2007-7-2 01:07:00 | 只看该作者
and to be more specific will be advantageous
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-2 18:47:00 | 只看该作者

请版主能指点一下我的作文吗? 感激不尽!

另外请问我现在看《economics》,看范文,再练习的方法对吗?

8#
发表于 2007-7-3 00:42:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rio在2007-7-2 1:07:00的发言:
and to be more specific will be advantageous

thanks a lot, and how can i do that?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-7 06:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部