ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 天山
打印 上一主题 下一主题

欢迎sbbi,braveMBA等大牛参与讨论新JJ的语法现象

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2003-11-4 11:17:00 | 只看该作者
the comments above r right.tianshan,u shall take chipmunk's advice.
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-11-4 11:21:00 | 只看该作者
以上解释合情合理,但是将这一原则用到以下句子中:Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy  absorbed by snow.
                   by rducing 中reducing的执行者岂不是globe了?这......
13#
发表于 2003-11-4 11:24:00 | 只看该作者
1. by doing本身没错.但by using如果作为一个词组的话没有with合适.既by using < with.

2. investor use the company’s earnings to pay off the debt 本身不符合逻辑.

3. to do1 with sth1 and to do2 by sth2 更平行一些.
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-11-4 11:25:00 | 只看该作者
也许我成了惊弓之鸟了,被ETS搞怕了(上次就败在语法上了),所以现在我不得不去一点点地弄清楚任何语法点。
15#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-11-4 11:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sbbi在2003-11-4 11:24:00的发言:
1. by doing本身没错.但by using如果作为一个词组的话没有with合适.既by using < with.

2. investor use the company’s earnings to pay off the debt 本身不符合逻辑.

3. to do1 with sth1 and to do2 by sth2 更平行一些.


investor use the company’s earnings to pay off the debt 本身不符合逻辑?也许是我理解错了,我觉得earnings 的逻辑主语应该是inverstors.

16#
发表于 2003-11-4 11:38:00 | 只看该作者
investor hopes (the company) to pay of the debt. so the company is the logical subject of using (if we have to use 'using')
17#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-11-4 11:47:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks , sbbi!
18#
发表于 2003-11-5 03:21:00 | 只看该作者
From sbbi: investor hopes (the company) to pay of the debt. so the company is the logical subject of using (if we have to use 'using')?

Disagree!      ls see the question:

In a leveraged buyout, investors borrow huge sums of money to buy companies, hoping to pay off the debt by using the company’s earnings and to profit richly by the later resale of the companies or their divisions.

The topic is: In a leveraged buyout, investors borrow money to buy companies, hoping to pay off (investors') debt by using the company’s earnings and to ( investors) profit richly by the later resale of the companies or their divisions.
19#
发表于 2003-11-5 05:11:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得债主子不能用欠债人的收入还债.否则就成南霸天了
只有欠债人那自己的收入还去债
20#
发表于 2003-11-5 06:20:00 | 只看该作者
There is another clue: "In a leveraged buyout",  it means borrowing  less money then profiting from the sale.
Therefore, the "debts" means " investors borrow huge sums of money".
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 07:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部