|
有没有人愿意看一下我写的第一篇综合写作 The speaker broaches several counterarguments against the reading paragraph regarding the cost of private space travel, the possibility of discoveries and the burden of taxpayer. First, the cost of private space travel will not go down as the reading argues. Quite the contrary, some issues make the ticket of private space travel stay expensive. For example, the space-traffic control system and money spent on repeatedly testing the safety of the aircraft. All these added money will keep the price high and therefore won’t benefit space exploration. This is entirely different from the situation described in the passage. The speaker also questions the statement in reading passage that privatization of space travel will facilitate the scientific discovery. The lecturer posits that scientists will be allured to focus on commercial researches rather than scientific ones by the high salary of private commercial companies. As a result, there are not enough scientists involved in the work of scientific discovery and the process is slowed down accordingly. This is a second dimension objecting to the opinion in passage. Finally, the speaker refers to the burden of taxpayer. In the reading paragraph, the author deems that taxpayer will be freed from the high tax pay because ticket sales assume quite a part of the space travel’s expense. Consequently the part assigned to taxpayers is reduced. However, in the lecture, the speaker provides vital evidence to rebut this. He points out that the building of space station and space airports requires quite a chunk of fund. This problem can not be addressed by private investors alone, and the money has to be paid by advancing the tax people pay. |