ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3392|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

885 SEC D 2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-24 06:51:00 | 只看该作者

885 SEC D 2

2.    As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

答案C。 我想问B错在哪儿?好象也说得过去。
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2003-10-24 07:34:00 | 只看该作者
Sorry, 我又犯了同一错误,搜索出点问题,发完帖看见了gemj以前的解释:

这句话的意思是, 随着房价升高,中产阶级受的影响最大, 因为他们不再能付得起了. 尽管如此,租房也令他们难受.正确表达这个意思的是C, A的三个AND相连, 好象在说三个毫不相干的三件事. B出现了RUN-ON结构, FURTHERMORE是不能连结句子的.E, D未能准确地表达上述的意思。而且E逻辑也不通。
板凳
发表于 2006-11-22 15:21:00 | 只看该作者

新问,A,D,E项既然用了and ,假设逻辑关系对,是不是其中的these families也有重复的嫌疑啊?!

所以,能不能作为排除的依据噻?

地板
发表于 2007-5-14 20:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用huoduoduo在2006-11-22 15:21:00的发言:

新问,A,D,E项既然用了and ,假设逻辑关系对,是不是其中的these families也有重复的嫌疑啊?!

所以,能不能作为排除的依据噻?

good question, up

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-24 05:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部