95年以前的题有练习价值么?

秋天的虫子 · 发表于 2006-10-22 01:52:00

据说95年以前的题是委托ETS出的,而且我个人的感觉也是LR有的题套路和新题不太一样(不一定是变难,只是新题做多了对有些套路形成条件反射了~)

所以错误率反而比前段时间做95后的题要高不少(当然自己状态不好也有关系),大家也有这种感觉么?

我现在是放弃这些老题,回头把部分新题再做一遍,还是把所有没做的题做完呢,(个人感觉做老题对提高速度还是很有帮助的)

当然,这个选择只是对LR来说,因为RC和lG做过的印象都比较深,基本没实战练习意义了...

部分观点只是个人观点,牛牛们见笑了,还望不吝赐教~

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-26 10:31:27编辑过]

markram · 发表于 2006-10-26 09:50:00

PrepTests 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18

All of these tests were created in whole or in part before the current LSAT test producer (ACT) took over from LSAS. PrepTests before 11 (including 18 & 16) were made entirely by LSAS. Tests 12-15 were partly written by ACT but they had to use some of LSAS's questions. After December 1995 all the tests were made wholly by ACT (Preptest 17, the "Official LSAT PrepTest with Explanations", the SuperPrep tests, and PrepTests 19+).

秋天的虫子 · 发表于 2006-10-26 10:34:00

以下是引用markram在2006-10-26 9:50:00的发言：

PrepTests 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18

All of these tests were created in whole or in part before the current LSAT test producer (ACT) took over from LSAS. PrepTests before 11 (including 18 & 16) were made entirely by LSAS. Tests 12-15 were partly written by ACT but they had to use some of LSAS's questions. After December 1995 all the tests were made wholly by ACT (Preptest 17, the "Official LSAT PrepTest with Explanations", the SuperPrep tests, and PrepTests 19+).

thanx, however i would say: so what about these history...

can u give me some advise on whether it is more helpful to do pretests before 95.12 than redo the recent pretests?

thanx again

newbon · 发表于 2006-11-5 10:46:00

虫子,键盘好不了

95年以前的题有练习价值么?

95年以前的题有练习价值么?

所属分类: 法学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()