TWE everyday~~!!!! add oil~~

报了4月19号的香港CBT~~~进入冲刺阶段！！！

为了督促自己复习，写作文，准备把每天的作文贴上来，希望大家帮我指点一下哦~~~！！！！（打个分数顺便）

3月26号：

（用了模板，为了避免word的自动更正，用windows notepad写的）

Topic:

Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Recently, there is a debate over whether it is better to dine out or cook by oneself. Some people assert that, there are more advantages to go to the food stands or restaurants to have meals, while others believe that it will be more beneficial to prepare and eat at one's own place. As a matter of fact, the issue of whether to dine outside is a complex and controversial one. Different people hold different views due to their distinct backgrounds. Therefore, there is not a universal answer to this question, and whether one choice takes precedence over the other may quite depend on the specific situation. The decision, nevertheless, is not an easy one to make. Actually, the final judgment should rely on a case-by-case analysis. As far as I am concerned, however, I agree that cooking by oneself and eat at home should be a wiser choice, and dining out is less favorable. My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

The first argument that can be presented to develop my position is that it is much healthier to prepare and cook by oneself. As the quality of the materials restaraunts using are not quite ensured these days. Choosing the raw materials by oneself can guarantee they are fresh and clean enough at least. Also, we can use healthy ways to cook our food, for example, we can avoid high-calorie or high-fat by using alternitive materials. In addition, We can balance our diet by selecting more nutritional foods.

The second reason is even more obvious, to eat at home will be less a financial burden for our life expenditure. The foods in the restaurants are quite expensive, and by cooking at home will save us a huge amount of money.

In addition, there is another reason for me to choose this statement. Cooking can be an enjoyable activity. It can be considered as an art of creation. With all kinds of tools, such as the knives, the containers and the cooking machines, we can release our imagination and creat delicious cuisines, new flavors of drinks, or presenting a goodlooking of the food. As a word, cooking can be a pleasure.

Admittedly, it may be true that dining outside will be more convenient for our busy lives. However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that dining out is a better choice. However, when the advantages and disadvantages of dining out or cooking at home are carefully examined, the most striking conclusion is obvious that cooking by oneself will be more favorable.

To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate with each other to generate an integrate whole and thus become more convincing than any single one of them, we may be comfortable to say that there are more benefits to eat at home, because it is healthier, less expensive and more enjoyable.

400多字。我自己觉得这篇文章没怎么用例子，而且有的段落明显字数少。。。

想请问举例子的话怎么写啊，因为描述一件事情需要很多字数啊。。。本来字数就很多了。。

谢谢各位不吝赐教哦~~！！！！

以后每天一贴~~~大家督促哦~~

支持支持 加油

虽然我五月考 但也在奋斗中

不好意思~~~这么多篇才写第二篇~~~这星期考试啊没时间写。。。。。

还请大家指点一下，提提建议

打个分数什么的

谢谢！！

P. S.有个问题想问啊：写作文一定要有“例子”吗？

Topic:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.

This is a complex and controversial issue about whether or not a zoo has useful purpose. Different people may hold different views due to their distinct backgrounds. Therefore, there is no universal answer to this question, and whether one argument takes precedence over the other quite depends on the specific situations. The judgment, nevertheless, is not an easy one to make. Actually, the final conclusion should rely on a case-by-case analysis. As far as I am concerned, however, I disagree that a zoo has no useful purpose. My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

An essential argument is that a zoo can provide people a place to relax and have fun. This function of zoos is like parks, for zoos can be considered as theme parks. With the theme of experiencing the animal world, zoos make people have more choices to spend their spare time and enjoy their lives.

Another main argument is zoos can be another afterschool class for both children and adults to learn more about our nature and our coexisting 'friends' in our nature. Without zoos children, especially children who grow up in cities, will have few opportunities to have a look at wild animals with their own eyes. Seeing from pictures or videos and learning from books is an extremely different story from experiencing on their own.

In addition, zoos also have the function of protecting the animals who are dying out. Some national safari parks are operating this function successfully. This is beneficial to both human beings and other species.

To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate with each other to generate an integrated whole and thus become more convincing than any single one of them, we may be comfortable to say that a zoo does have useful purposes, such as the place for people to have fun, the function as a afterschool class, and the protection for the animals.

323words

班主可否帮忙移动到TWE版？

谢谢阿~~~~

抱歉,来晚了.