求问大神 Manhattan练习题

挂树枝上悠着 · 发表于 2018-12-1 10:42:52

Heating oil and natural gas futures rose sharply yesterday, as long-term forecasts for much colder temperatures in key heating regions raised fears of insufficient supplies capable of meeting the demand this winter.

A of insufficient supplies capable of meeting

B of supplies that would be insufficient for meeting

C of insufficient supplies that are unable to meet

D that there would be supplies insufficient for meeting

E that supplies would be insufficient to meet

这道题选E 我稍微有些明白 of是限定词而that是解释一整件事，这里强调fear的是insufficient supplies无法满足冬天燃料的需求这一整件事，而不是fear的是insufficient supplies

但对比Manhattan的练习题，

The principal tried to calm the worried students’ parents, as a result of those students fighting at the pep rally.错误
The principal tried to calm the worried parents of the students who had fought at the pep rally.正确

它说what is worrying the adults is not the students themselves but their fight.

我不明白这两句难道不都是修饰students的吗第一句是后置定语第二句是定语从句？

求问大神

挂树枝上悠着 · 发表于 2018-12-1 11:35:31

顶一下自己

fuckoffand · 发表于 2018-12-1 13:37:48

因为第一句用的是as a result of... 你把第一句的fighting at the pep rally去掉就变成了 principle calmed the worried students parents, as a result of those students. 不合理，而第二句的话who had fought就先定了院长安慰那些学生的父母，哪些学生？打架的那群。

挂树枝上悠着 · 发表于 2018-12-1 15:23:46

fuckoffand 发表于 2018-12-1 13:37
因为第一句用的是as a result of... 你把第一句的fighting at the pep rally去掉就变成了 principle calmed ...

为什么不能把第二句的who had fought at the pep rally去掉呢？这样也变成家长担心的是孩子不是孩子们打架这件事

Thisis呱呱小 · 发表于 2020-6-7 14:06:21

挂树枝上悠着发表于 2018-12-1 15:23
为什么不能把第二句的who had fought at the pep rally去掉呢？这样也变成家长担心的是孩子不是孩子们 ...

who had fought at pep 是essential modifier，怎么能去掉

[SC悬赏令] 求问大神 Manhattan练习题

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()