ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2425|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助一道SC题 OG2018V-SC-275 | OG2015V-SC-69 | OG2017V-SC-280 | OG2016V-SC-91

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-9-23 16:14:33 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale,with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were connected by a complex regional system of roads.
(A) scale,with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were
(B) scale,with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,
(C) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms, each that had been
(D) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms and with each
(E) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms,each had been


答案选B,这句话的意思说的是structure connected by而不是rooms connected by吗?还有b选项的with引导的句子修饰的是built吗?这道题做了好几次了,每次都错,分析的时候通过哪个点排除比较好呢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2018-9-24 12:22:42 | 只看该作者
让大神ron来解析吧

choice a is a run-on - it tries to have two main verbs without using any sort of subordinating element. if you take out modifiers, adjectives, etc., you're left with the following: the settlements were built with structures were connected. that's bad.

choice b is correct: it uses a nonessential modifier set off by commas ('of up to 600 rooms each'), which, if eliminated, yields the intact and legitimate sentence ...carefully engineered structures, connected by... (with another nonessential modifier).

choice c:
- 'scale of' doesn't make sense
- you can't say 'each that had...' (can't follow 'each' with a relative pronoun - if you're going to use a relative pronoun, it has to come directly after the thing it's trying to modify)
- no justification for using the past perfect ('had been') - that verb, if there's a verb there at all, should be in the simple past (the same tense as everything else in the sentence, because everything described in the sentence is contemporaneous)
- it doesn't make sense to use 'each' AFTER the comma, because it's not true that each structure was connected with a road system. instead, the road system connected all of the structures with each other, which is nowhere close to the same thing. (having 'each' BEFORE the comma makes sense, because it's actually true that each of the structures comprised up to 600 rooms.)
analogy:
the USA comprises 50 states, each of which is united by a federal government --> wrong (the implication is that each state has its own federal government)
the USA comprises 50 states, all of which are united by a federal government --> correct
the USA comprises 50 states, (all) united by a federal government --> correct, whether you have 'all' or not

choice d:
- 'scale of' doesn't make sense
- the use of AND sets up ostensible parallelism, but the two structures given aren't parallel (one starts with of and the other with with)

choice e is also a run-on sentence (you'll see this if you reduce it to its 'skeleton', a la choice a)
板凳
发表于 2018-9-24 12:23:27 | 只看该作者
Hi Ron,
In choice B, two modifiers are not connected by and. is that ok?
I was expecting something like '..of up to 600 rooms each and conneted...'
Can you please comment?
Thanks in advance,

Ron:
nope, that would be incorrect.

the current form is the correct modifier, because it's modifying the 75 structures (of up to 600 rooms each).

if you added "and", then that would lock the following word, connected, into a parallel structure.
the problem is that "connected" is a past participle, and the only other word in the sentence that could be parallel to it is the past participle "built".

so, by adding "and", you'd be unwittingly creating the following parallel structure:

The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were
built on a spectacular scale with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, and
connected by a complex regional system of roads.

this is wrong, since it implies that the settlements themselves were connected by a system of roads. it's the structures that were thus connected.
地板
发表于 2018-9-24 12:25:15 | 只看该作者
jp.jprasanna wrote:So can i take it as a rule that any nonessential modifier set off by commas ('of up to 600 rooms each'), which can be eliminated to check what modifiers are attached to the main clause??

Ron:

nope. you have to think about which things are describing which other things.

* it's possible that both modifiers are describing the same noun, as in the example above. in that case, well, you have to put one of them before the other one (since you can't draw a sentence that looks like a probability tree), so you get the kind of structure that exists in (b).

* it's also possible that the second modifier describes something in the first modifier.
e.g.,
In the fourth lane is Tony Cardinale, the son of Vinny and Alessandra Cardinale, two former Olympic swimmers from Italy.
in this case, two former... is describing vinny and alessandra, not tony.
5#
发表于 2018-9-24 12:33:57 | 只看该作者

The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, connected by a complex regional system of roads.

概括下 ,大神说of up to 600 rooms each,和connected by a complex regional system of roads都是修饰structures

structures每个有多达600房间,而structures由 a complex regional system of roads 连通起来
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-24 14:35:16 | 只看该作者
kluivert 发表于 2018-9-24 12:33
The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale with more than 75 careful ...

很清晰了,谢谢解答!
7#
发表于 2018-9-25 00:15:27 | 只看该作者
kluivert 发表于 2018-9-24 12:33
The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale with more than 75 careful ...

你好,非常感谢你的帮助!请问在哪里或者什么途径可以找到这种解答呢
8#
发表于 2018-9-25 01:27:59 | 只看该作者
鼓手 发表于 2018-9-25 00:15
你好,非常感谢你的帮助!请问在哪里或者什么途径可以找到这种解答呢

google的!都会出来各种链接

gmatclub的,manhattan的!尤其是manhattan的很多都是大神ron在退出前回复的帖子
9#
发表于 2018-9-28 14:01:13 | 只看该作者
鼓手 发表于 2018-9-25 00:15
你好,非常感谢你的帮助!请问在哪里或者什么途径可以找到这种解答呢

大陆不能用的话,可以尝试用 bing.com 来搜索啊

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 01:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部