ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1217|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于Ron 2015-12-03 SC视频中逻辑主语的疑问。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-5-23 10:44:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
A. imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
B. imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
C. that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
D. that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
E. that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
OA:  D


在视频1:01:00的时候,Ron说E错,是因为spending的逻辑主语是plans,不符合逻辑。
而正确的D选项里,spending的逻辑主语是doctors,这个我就不理解了。
因为D选项里,and 前后是that从句两个并列的谓语“plans that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients”可以还原成两个句子:
1、plans impose stricter limits on medical services.
2、plans require doctors to see more patients.
那如果spending是修饰句子2,那逻辑主语应该还是plans啊,怎么会是doctors?comma+ing应该是修饰前面整个句子的谓语,那就是修饰require,也不能修饰to see啊。


理解不能理解不能理解不能理解不能理解不能
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2018-10-11 15:38:32 | 只看该作者
好巧,我也不能理解,今天被comma ving的逻辑主语问题搞晕了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 01:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部