ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1216|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

费费-79引起的困惑---误选“支持“当”假设“?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-1 05:17:00 | 只看该作者

费费逻辑79引起的困惑---误选“支持“当”假设“?

各位NN,


    小弟在做79题时,发现A, C, D三选项都可以导出结论, 当然看到E时, 觉得E肯定为答案。 可还是很困惑如何鉴别 “支持“ 选项和 ”假设“选项”?


79. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?



A.        Urban pollution has not doubled in the past decade.  (支持)


B.        Doctors and patients generally ignore the role of allergies in asthma.


C.        Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the recommended instructions.


       (我觉得是支持, 答案说是 无关或削弱?)


D.       The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other diseases that frequently occur among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal outcomes even when the asthma itself does not.


       (和C一样,支持)


E.        Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths, and the used of asthma deaths, and the use of bronchial inhalers are the only possible explanations of the increased death rate due to asthma.


答案 E。

沙发
发表于 2005-8-1 23:55:00 | 只看该作者

这是ASSUMPTION类的问题, 由于你没有贴出整个题目, 所以我不太清楚你的问题到底是什么。


但对于这类题目类型, 最好的办法(也是唯一的办法)就是将答案取非, 取非后削弱原来的ARGUMENT就是正确答案。如果你感觉答案有支持的作用,用这样的办法完全可以排除其干扰.



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-1 23:58:09编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2005-9-15 09:47:00 | 只看该作者

feifei-79 完整的题目:


Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate from this disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate. Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First, the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and accurate in the past decade than it had been previously. Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution. However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically even in cities with long-standing, comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution, one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms.


Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


(A) Urban pollution has not doubled in the past decade.


(B) Doctors and patients generally ignore the role of allergies in asthma.


(C) Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the recommended instructions.


(D) The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other diseases that frequently occur among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal outcomes even when the asthma itself does not.


(E) Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths, and the used of asthma deaths, and the use of bronchial inhalers are the only possible explanations of the increased death rate due to asthma.


我第一次做题时选C,对C取非的确也能够削弱结论,所以感觉很迷惑,请高手指点!

地板
发表于 2005-9-20 09:28:00 | 只看该作者

题目里先说出两个可能使death rate double的原因,接着排出了这两个原因,


然后就得出,一定是第三个原因使得death rate double。


分析:


1、排出了2个,就能肯定是第3个,就说明前提假设是只有3个原因。因此 E 正确


2、你选择C,但是这个假设放入原题,只能得出bronchial inhalers可能导致death rate double,但不是除前2个原因之外的唯一一个原因,也就不能得出结论(death rate double 一定是由于试用inhalers)

5#
发表于 2005-9-21 00:05:00 | 只看该作者

I think the reason that answer E is correct is because this is a "Justify the conclusion" question, but not an Assumption. The main difference between the two, according the powerscore bible,is that the correct answer in justify is a sufficient condition, but a necessary condition for assumption. So if you add E to the stimulus, you can conclude while all other factors are not the cause, it must be the inhalers. You can't negate this answer choice to disprove the conclution, becuase you can't negate the sufficient to disprove the necessary, it is called Mistaken Negation.


This is just my understanding, please correct me if I am wrong.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-11 07:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部