ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1570|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]og18沒定論的問題

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-5 20:55:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]og18沒定論的問題

18. Each of Hemingway's wives--Hadley Richardson. Pauline Pfeiffer. Martha Gelhom. and Mary Welsh --were strong and interesting women, very different from the often pallid women who populate his novels.
(A) Each of Hemingway's wives--Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--were strong and interesting women,
(B) Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh--each of them Hemingway's wives--were strong and, interesting women,
(C) Hemingway's wives--Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--were all strong and interesting women,
(D) Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--each a wife of Hemingway, was
(E) Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--every one of Hemingway's wives were



翻了下以前的帖子


關於主語的問題還是沒個結論


望請大家討論



(D) Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--each a wife of Hemingway, was


按照之前的討論帖是認為each a wife of Hemingway是strong and interesting women的同位


我同意,但是後面那個逗點是怎麼一回事??


主語,動詞


不是很奇怪嗎???


(E) Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--every one of Hemingway's wives were


這裡我的理解是strong and interesting women是everyone one of Hemingway's wives的同位


這裡可以把strong and intersting women視為同位語移位提前嗎??


沙发
发表于 2005-7-5 22:08:00 | 只看该作者

(D) Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--each a wife of Hemingway, was


按照之前的討論帖是認為each a wife of Hemingway是strong and interesting women的同位


我同意,但是後面那個逗點是怎麼一回事??


--逗号是用来分隔同位语和谓语的,是必须的,否则同位语就变成主语了。可以参见OG上玛雅人盖房子题。


主語,動詞


不是很奇怪嗎???


(E) Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--every one of Hemingway's wives were


這裡我的理解是strong and interesting women是everyone one of Hemingway's wives的同位


這裡可以把strong and intersting women視為同位語移位提前嗎??


----主语与谓语中间应该没有逗号,因此every one of Hemingway's wives应理解为主语,Strong and interesting women为同位语(同位在前,主语在后在OG和大全中都有例子的)


请讨论。

板凳
发表于 2005-7-5 22:13:00 | 只看该作者
有意思,学习,学习。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-6 22:18:00 | 只看该作者

同意你對D的說法


照理說主謂間不放逗點


是因為要隔開同位語和謂語才這樣做的是吧???



對於E


你說的結構是這樣吧


同位語,主語+謂語??


例如og56正確答案就是個漂亮的例子


56. Architects and stonemasons, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.



C  the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel





回到18 E選項



(A)          Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--every one of Hemingway's wives were



strong and interesting women和every one中間是不是需要放個逗點,才較符合ETS對同位語的偏好呢???



5#
发表于 2006-2-4 15:36:00 | 只看该作者
对呀这个问题还是没有定论 NN们来个终结吧  不是还挺常考的难点么?叫什么信息的层次
6#
发表于 2006-2-5 16:28:00 | 只看该作者
UP
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-13 19:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部