ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5497|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[实习就业] Career Report

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-11-29 09:43:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Career Report
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2011-11-29 09:53:42 | 只看该作者
Columbia是51%的毕业生去finance
板凳
发表于 2011-11-29 10:38:56 | 只看该作者
但比绝对值有什么意义,两个学校的class size又不一样
地板
发表于 2011-11-29 11:14:24 | 只看该作者
I have done some data digging. Below is the percentage data. all data are from 2010 career reports of the two schools.
Both screenshot and excel file are attached.


Yellow highlight=win


For finance:
Columbia has the upper hand in investment banking, hedge fund/mutual funds, sales and trading, private wealth management
Booth has advantage in PE/VC
Investment management/research is a draw between the two schools


For consulting:
Booth has more people going to consulting
but Columbia sends more people to MBB.

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
5#
发表于 2011-11-29 11:20:15 | 只看该作者
大家看学校的就业都是直接只拿Finance和consulting出来比的。。
6#
发表于 2011-11-29 11:41:31 | 只看该作者
进去了以后基本是和自己的同学在竞争,一个公司多招几个或者少招几个没有太大区别。因为600多人争30个posts和700个人争40个posts本质上没啥区别。而且还要看去了哪个office,是美国还是中国的。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-29 21:27:03 | 只看该作者
I have done some data digging. Below is the percentage data. all data are from 2010 career reports of the two schools.
Both screenshot and excel file are attached.


Yellow highlight=win


For finance:
Columbia has the upper hand in investment banking, hedge fund/mutual funds, sales and trading, private wealth management
Booth has advantage in PE/VC
Investment management/research is a draw between the two schools


For consulting:
Booth has more people going to consulting
but Columbia sends more people to MBB.
-- by 会员 很丑的鬼脸 (2011/11/29 11:14:24)




good stuff!
8#
发表于 2011-11-29 22:09:51 | 只看该作者
finance+consulting都达到70%,太恐怖了。
9#
发表于 2011-11-29 23:38:46 | 只看该作者
按function算都已经接近80%了。
10#
发表于 2011-12-4 02:41:38 | 只看该作者
Am a Chicago alum now in S&T, so may well be biased.. here is my two cents after a tough month in the markets..

Both are good schools and could possibly get you a job in finance. Functions in finance matters a lot though.

I think the training in Finance at Chicago most likely is more solid, cos of the quality of faculty, curriculum, and most importantly flexibility. You can take lots of PhD lvl courses in finance and economics if you feel up to it at Chicago...not too sure abt if it is the case in Columbia..

Function in finance matters as if you are really market focused, ie S&T related, then you'd  better learn some solid statstics/economics/finance skills; if more clients facing and presentation, then trainings matter alot less...being good-looking is much more important ;-)

In terms alum network in the investment bank industry, both have extensive network..and your school/education backgrnd won't matter at all once you get into the door...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-24 22:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部