已锁

阿伦艾弗森

http://forum.chasedream.com/TOEFL_Writing/thread-790663-1-1.html
不要重复发帖，所有作文都发到一个帖子下面，方便互改的同学找到你的作文




12月10日综合写作。TPO5

the reading passage mainly provides us with three usages of the settlements of Chaco Canyon. The professor deals with the same issue. However, he thinks that none of the arguments provide by reading is convincing.

Firstly, the reading discusses that Chaco structures were used for residents living. In contrast, the professor claims that though the structures outside look like the architecture for living, the inside of the structure were not used for living. They have the space which could be lived for hundreds of people, but they don't have many fire place for hundreds people daily cooking. They just have few fire place and the largest room in the structure just have the fire place which only could be used for 10 people.

Secondly, the reading makes the point that the structures may use for storing food supply. Whereas the professor demonstrates that though it sounds plausible that the structure used for food supply, they do not have maise containers and any trace for food. So the structures could not be a place to store grain.

Thirdly, the reading states that the structures may be a place for ceremonial centers. The professor casts doubts that the structures contain not only broken pots but also other materials for building such as sand, stones and so on so forth. These materials might be trash which did not be used when the house built up. Also, those pots might be the containers of food for construction workers.